...
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >Initiation of generic imatinib may improve medication adherence for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia
【24h】

Initiation of generic imatinib may improve medication adherence for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

机译:通用伊马替尼的启动可以改善慢性骨髓性白血病患者的药物依从性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose To compare adherence to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) between patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who initiated branded or generic imatinib. Methods We used MarketScan commercial claims data (January 2011-June 2018) to identify patients with CML who newly initiated branded imatinib before 1 August 2015 or generic imatinib on or after 2 February 2016, and were continuously enrolled in health plans for 6 months before through 6 months following their initial fill. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, we compared adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC]) and persistence (no gaps >= 30 and >= 60 consecutive days in therapy) to TKI therapy. Results Patients initiating generic imatinib consistently had higher average PDC per month and over the 6-month follow-up period than initiators of branded imatinib. Average 6-month PDC was 92% (95%CI:89%-94%) for generic initiators and 85% (95%CI:83%-86%) for brand initiators. Compared with branded imatinib initiators, a larger proportion of generic imatinib initiators were adherent and persistent to TKI therapy (PDC >= 90%:78% versus 64%; no >= 60-day gap:94% versus 86%). Conclusions Patients initiating generic imatinib achieved clinically significant improvements in adherence to TKI therapy relative to branded drug users, presumably due to lower out-of-pocket costs. Given the importance of optimal adherence in CML, considering barriers to adherence (eg, patient-cost sharing and health benefit design) when selecting initial treatment may improve long-term medication adherence. Pharmacoepidemiologic studies should consider how best to account for expected cost-sharing and its impact on adherence and subsequent clinical outcomes.
机译:目的,可以将胸苷激酶抑制剂(TKIS)与发起品牌或通用伊马替尼的慢性骨髓白血病(CML)之间的抗蛋白酶激酶抑制剂(TKI)进行比较。方法采用Marketscan商业索赔数据(2018年1月 - 2018年1月)鉴定患有CML的CML患者,在2015年8月1日或2016年2月2日或之后或之后的新发起的品牌伊马替尼患者,并经过前6个月的持续注册卫生计划初始填充后6个月。在治疗加权的逆概率后,我们比较了依从性(涵盖的日子比例)和持续存在(无间隙> = 30和> = 60连续日期,治疗)至TKI治疗。结果启动通用iMatinib的患者每月平均PDC始终如一,比品牌伊马替尼的启动人员在6个月的随访期间。通用引发剂平均6个月的PDC为92%(95%CI:89%-94%),为品牌启动人员85%(95%:83%-86%)。与品牌的伊马替尼引发剂相比,较大比例的通用iMatinib引发剂是依赖和持续到TKI治疗(PDC> = 90%:78%对64%;否> = 60天间隙:94%与86%)。结论发起通用伊马替尼的患者在临床上取得临床显着的改进,相对于品牌吸毒者遵守TKI治疗,可能是由于较低的袋中成本。鉴于CML中最佳遵守的重要性,考虑到选择初始治疗时,考虑遵守障碍(例如,患者 - 成本共享和健康益处设计)可以改善长期药物依从性。药物化学学研究应考虑如何最好地考虑预期的成本分摊及其对遵守和随后的临床结果的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号