...
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >Agreement between self-reported and registry-based use of sleep medications and tranquilizers
【24h】

Agreement between self-reported and registry-based use of sleep medications and tranquilizers

机译:自我报告和基于注册管理使用的睡眠药物和镇静剂之间的协议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose The purpose of the present study was to assess the agreement between self-reported use of sleep medications and tranquilizers and dispensed hypnotics and anxiolytics. Methods Self-reported medication use was obtained from the population-based survey Health and Environment in Oslo (HELMILO) (2009-2010) (n = 13 019). Data on dispensed hypnotics and anxiolytics were obtained from the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD). As measures of validity, we calculated sensitivity and specificity using both self-reports and prescription records as the reference standard. Furthermore, we calculated Cohen's kappa. Current self-reported medication use was compared with prescription data in time windows of both 100 and 200 days preceding questionnaire completion. Results The highest sensitivity was observed for current sleep medication use in the 100-day time window (sensitivity = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74, 0.79) when using prescription records as the reference standard. Sensitivity was generally lower for tranquilizers compared with sleep medications. Cohen's kappa showed the highest agreement for the 200-day time window with substantial agreement for sleep medications (kappa = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.67) and moderate agreement for tranquilizers (kappa = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.41, 0.48). Conclusions The present study suggests moderate to substantial agreement between self-reported use of sleep medications and tranquilizers and dispensed drugs in a general adult population. The magnitude of agreement varied according to drug category and time window. Since self-reported and registry-based use of these drug classes does not match each other accurately, limitations of each data source should be considered when such medications are applied as the exposure or outcome in epidemiologic studies.
机译:目的本研究的目的是评估自我报告的睡眠药物和镇静剂和分配的催眠药和抗焦虑的协议。方法从奥斯陆(Helmilo)(2009-2010)(N = 13 019)中获得自我报告的药物用途。从挪威处方数据库(NORPD)获得了分配催眠和抗焦虑的数据。作为有效度,我们使用自我报告和处方记录作为参考标准计算敏感性和特异性。此外,我们计算了Cohen的Kappa。将当前的自我报告的药物用途与在第100和200天的时间窗口中的处方数据进行比较。结果使用处方记录使用处方记录作为参考标准时,在100天时间窗口中使用最高睡眠用药(灵敏度= 0.76,95%):0.74,0.79),观察到最高敏感性。与睡眠药物相比,镇静剂敏感性较低。科恩的Kappa为200天时间窗口达成最高的睡眠药物协议(Kappa = 0.64; 95%Ci:0.62,0.67)和适度协议的镇静剂(Kappa = 0.45; 95%Ci:0.41,0.48) 。结论本研究表明,自我报告使用睡眠药物和镇静剂和一般成年人口中的分配药物之间的适当协议。协议的严重程度根据药物类别和时间窗口而变化。由于基于自我报告的和基于登记的使用这些药物类别,因此当这种药物作为流行病学研究中的暴露或结果应用时,应考虑每个数据源的局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号