...
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >The validity of sequence symmetry analysis (SSA) for adverse drug reaction signal detection.
【24h】

The validity of sequence symmetry analysis (SSA) for adverse drug reaction signal detection.

机译:序列对称分析(SSA)对不利药物反应信号检测的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

To determine the validity of sequence symmetry analysis (SSA) method to detect adverse drug reactions from an administrative claims database.Published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of 19 medicines were identified through search databases, product information (PI) or the US Food and Drug Administration Web site. All adverse events (AEs) in the RCTs and the PI for the medicines were extracted. AEs were considered 'gold standard positive events' if they were reported as being statistically significant events in adequately powered RCTs. The remaining AEs were considered 'gold standard negative events' if the event was not listed as an AE in the PI for that medicine or any other medicine in its class. Indicators of AEs were identified by consensus from two clinical researchers. SSA was run for each medicine-indicator pair using four different time windows: 3, 6, 9 and 12?months.A total of 120 randomised placebo controlled trials were reviewed for the 19 tested medicines. A total of 165 medicine-indicator pairs (44 positive and 121 negative events) were identified and tested by SSA. At the 12-month time window, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of SSA were 61% (95%CI 0.46-0.74), 93% (95%CI 0.87-0.96), 77% (95%CI 0.61-0.88) and 87% (95%CI 0.80-0.92), respectively. Using a 3-month time window, the SSA had a lower sensitivity (52%).The SSA technique was found to have moderate sensitivity and high specificity for detecting ADRs. These results suggest that SSA is a potential tool for detecting ADRs using administrative claims data that could complement existing pharmacosurveillance methods. Copyright ? 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:确定序列对称分析(SSA)方法的有效性,以检测来自行政权利要求数据库的不良药物反应。通过搜索数据库,产品信息(PI)或美国食品和药物来确定19种药物的一试的随机对照试验(RCT)管理网站。提取RCT中的所有不良事件(AES)和药物的PI。如果据报道,AES被认为是“金标准的积极事件”是在充分供电的RCT中有统计的重要事件。如果未在该药物的PI中列为AE,则剩余的AE被视为“黄金标准负面事件”。通过两种临床研究人员共识确定AES指标。使用四个不同的时间窗户为每种药物指标对运行SSA:3,6,9和12?月份,将120种随机安慰剂对照试验进行综述,对19个测试的药物进行了审查。通过SSA鉴定并测试了总共165种药物指示剂对(44个阳性和121个阴性事件)。在12个月的时间窗口中,SSA的敏感性,特异性,正负预测值为61%(95%CI 0.46-0.74),93%(95%CI 0.87-0.96),77%(95%CI 0.61 -0.88)和87%(95%CI 0.80-0.92)。使用3个月的时间窗口,SSA的灵敏度较低(52%)。发现SSA技术具有中等灵敏度和对检测ADR的高度特异性。这些结果表明,SSA是使用可以补充现有药物疗程方法的行政权利要求的数据来检测ADR的潜在工具。版权? 2013年John Wiley&Sons,Ltd。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号