首页> 外文期刊>Physiological measurement >Assessment of microcirculation in the diabetic foot with laser speckle contrast imaging
【24h】

Assessment of microcirculation in the diabetic foot with laser speckle contrast imaging

机译:激光散斑对比度成像评估糖尿病脚微循环

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: A major challenge for treating diabetic foot ulcers is estimating the severity of ischemia, as the currently used non-invasive diagnostic techniques provide relatively poor prognostic values. Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) is a promising non-invasive technique to assess microcirculation. Our aim was to investigate the stability and reproducibility of LSCI for the assessment of microcirculation in the diabetic foot, the relation of LSCI results to currently used non-invasive blood pressure measurements, and the ability of LSCI to discriminate between the degrees of ischemia. Approach: Thirty-three participants with diabetic foot ulcers were included in this prospective, single centre, observational cohort study that was conducted in the Netherlands. They were classified as non-ischemic, ischemic or critical-ischemic based on criteria formulated in the international guidelines. Two clinicians performed LSCI scans of the foot, consisting of baseline measurements, followed by two stress tests (post-occlusion peak and elevation test). With three measurement conditions and five regions of interest of the foot per patient, a total of 15 measurements were available for analyses. Main results: The intra-observer agreement of LSCI was high (interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.711–0.950; p < 0.001) for all 15 measurements. The inter-observer agreement was high (ICC = 0.728–0.861; p ? 0.001) for 10 measurements and moderate (ICC = 0.476–0.570; p ? 0.005) for the remaining five measurements. The interassessor agreement was high and significant (ICC = 0.857–0.996; p ? 0.001) for all measurements. Correlation between LSCI and non-invasive blood pressure measurements was low (ICC = ?0.272– 0.582). During both stress tests, microcirculation was significantly lower in critical-ischemic feet compared to non-ischemic feet (67.5 perfusion units (PU) versus 96.3 PU and 41.0 PU versus 63.9 PU; p < 0.05). Significance: LSCI is a stable and reproducible techn
机译:目的:治疗糖尿病足溃疡的主要挑战是估算缺血的严重程度,因为目前使用的非侵入性诊断技术提供相对较差的预后价值。激光散斑对比度成像(LSCI)是评估微循环的有前途的非侵入性技术。我们的目的是探讨LSCI对糖尿病脚下微循环评估的稳定性和再现性,LSCI结果对目前使用的非侵袭性血压测量的关系,以及LSCI在缺血程度之间区分的能力。方法:糖尿病足溃疡的三十三名参与者被列入在荷兰进行的这一前瞻性,单中心,观察队列研究中。基于国际指南中制定的标准,它们被归类为非缺血性,缺血性或危重缺血性。两名临床医生表现了脚的LSCI扫描,由基线测量组成,然后进行两个应力测试(后闭塞峰和升高试验)。对于每位患者的三个测量条件和脚的五个兴趣区域,共有15项测量可用于分析。主要结果:LSCI的观察者内部同步高(关联系数(ICC)= 0.711-0.950; p <0.001),适用于所有15次测量。观察员间协议高(ICC = 0.728-0.861;p≤0.001),用于10次测量和中等(ICC = 0.476-0.570;p≤0.005),但剩余的五次测量值。交流者协议高且显着(ICC = 0.857-0.996; P?0.001)用于所有测量。 LSCI与非侵入性血压测量之间的相关性低(ICC = 0.272- 0.582)。在两个压力测试期间,与非缺血脚相比,临界缺血性尺寸的微循环显着降低(67.5灌注单位(PU)与96.3 PU和41.0 PU与63.9 PU; P <0.05)。意义:LSCI是一种稳定而可重复的技术

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号