首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment: An International Journal for Scientific Research on the Relationship of Agriculture and Food Production to the Biosphere >Grazing management impacts on vegetation, soil biota and soil chemical, physical and hydrological properties in tall grass prairie
【24h】

Grazing management impacts on vegetation, soil biota and soil chemical, physical and hydrological properties in tall grass prairie

机译:高牧草地放牧管理对植被,土壤生物区系以及土壤化学,物理和水文特性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To assess whether adaptive management using multi-paddock grazing is superior to continuous grazing regarding conservation and restoration of resources we evaluated the impact of multi-paddock (MP) grazing at a high stocking rate compared to light continuous (LC) and heavy continuous (HC) grazing on neighboring commercial ranches in each of three proximate counties in north Texas tall grass prairie. The same management had been conducted on all ranches for at least the previous 9 years. Impact on soils and vegetation was compared to ungrazed areas (EX) in two of the counties. MP grazing was managed using light to moderate defoliation during the growing season followed by adequate recovery before regrazing after approximately 40 days and 80 days during fast and slow growing conditions, respectively. The vegetation was dominated by high seral grasses with MP grazing and EX, and dominated by short grasses and forbs with HC grazing. LC grazing had a lower proportion of high seral grasses than MP grazing or EX. Bare ground was higher on HC than LC. MP and EX, while soil aggregate stability was higher with MP than HC grazing but not LC grazing and EX. Soil penetration resistance was lowest with MP grazing and EX and highest with HC grazing. Bulk density did not differ among grazing management categories. Infiltration rate did not differ among grazing management categories but sediment loss was higher with HC than the other grazing management categories. Soil organic matter and cation exchange capacity were higher with MP grazing and EX than both LC and HC grazing. The fungal/bacterial ratio was highest with MP grazing indicating superior water-holding capacity and nutrient availability and retention for MP grazing. This study documents the positive results for long-term maintenance of resources and economic viability by ranchers who use adaptive management and MP grazing relative to those who practice continuous season-long stocking
机译:为了评估在资源保存和恢复方面使用多牧场放牧的适应性管理是否优于连续放牧,我们评估了高放养率与轻连续(LC)和重连续(HC)相比多牧场(MP)放牧的影响)在得克萨斯州北部高草草原上三个邻近县的每个县的邻近商业牧场上放牧。至少在过去的9年中,对所有牧场进行了相同的管理。在两个县中,将对土壤和植被的影响与未划伤地区(EX)进行了比较。在生长季节中,使用轻度至中度的落叶来管理MP放牧,然后分别在快速和缓慢生长条件下分别约40天和80天后适当恢复,然后再放牧。植被以高牧草为主,MP放牧和EX为主,短草和Forb牧草为HC放牧。与MP放牧或EX放牧相比,LC放牧的高草种比例较低。 HC的裸地高于LC。 MP和EX,而MP的土壤团聚体稳定性高于HC放牧,而LC和EX则没有。 MP放牧和EX的土壤渗透阻力最低,而HC放牧的最高。放牧管理类别之间的松密度没有差异。放牧管理类别之间的入渗率没有差异,但HC的沉积物损失高于其他放牧管理类别。 MP放牧和EX放牧的土壤有机质和阳离子交换能力均高于LC和HC放牧。 MP放牧的真菌/细菌比率最高,表明MP放牧具有优异的保水能力和养分利用率。这项研究记录了使用适应性管理和MP放牧的牧场主相对于长期进行长期放养的牧场主而言,长期维持资源和经济生存的积极结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号