首页> 外文期刊>Physics in perspective >The Concept of Fact in German Physics around 1900: A Comparison between Mach and Einstein
【24h】

The Concept of Fact in German Physics around 1900: A Comparison between Mach and Einstein

机译:1900年左右德国物理学的概念:马赫与爱因斯坦之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The concept of "fact" has a history. Over the past centuries, physicists have appropriated it in various ways. In this article, we compare Ernst Mach and Albert Einstein's interpretations of the concept. Mach, like most nineteenth-century German physicists, contrasted fact and theory. He understood facts as real and complex combinations of natural events. Theories, in turn, only served to order and communicate facts efficiently. Einstein's concept of fact was incompatible with Mach's, since Einstein believed facts could be theoretical too, just as he ascribed mathematical theorizing a leading role in representing reality. For example, he used the concept of fact to refer to a generally valid result of experience. The differences we disclose between Mach and Einstein were symbolic for broader tensions in the German physics discipline. Furthermore, they underline the historically fluid character of the category of the fact, both within physics and beyond.
机译:“事实”的概念有历史。 在过去的几个世纪里,物理学家以各种方式挪用它。 在本文中,我们比较Ernst Mach和Albert Einstein对该概念的解释。 马赫,如大多数十九世纪的德国物理学家,对比的事实和理论。 他理解自然事件的真实和复杂组合的事实。 反过来,理论依次才能有效地订购和沟通事实。 爱因斯坦的事实概念与马赫的概念是不相容的,因为爱因斯坦认为事实也可能是理论,就像他归因于代表现实的主要作用一样。 例如,他利用事实的概念来提到通常有效的经验结果。 我们在Mach和Einstein之间披露的差异是德国物理纪律更广泛的紧张局势的象征。 此外,它们强调了物理和超越的事实类别的历史流体特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号