首页> 外文期刊>Pedagogy in health promotion. >Institutional Review Board Basics for Pedagogy Research
【24h】

Institutional Review Board Basics for Pedagogy Research

机译:制度审查委员会基础知识用于教育学研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The institutional review board (IRB) process is often protracted and can be a source of frustration, especially when you want your research and publications to move apace. However, because of historical events, the IRB is an important requirement for conducting research with human participants and is regulated by federal oversite. When conducting research as part of a pedagogical study, it is important to identify which level of IRB review (exempt, expedited, or full board) is required. The purpose of this article is to highlight IRB basics within the United States for pedagogy research. Although there are guidelines internationally, this article specifically focuses on U.S. IRBs, including a brief history of the IRB, pedagogical and community-based participatory research, IRB review, tips for IRB submissions, and example case studies.
机译:机构审查委员会(IRB)进程往往是延长的,可能是令人沮丧的源泉,特别是当您希望您的研究和出版物移动Apace时。 然而,由于历史事件,IRB是对人类参与者进行研究的重要要求,由联邦犹豫监管。 当作为教学研究的一部分进行研究时,重要的是要确定需要哪种IRB审查(免税,加急或全膳)。 本文的目的是突出美国在美国的IRB基础知识进行教育学研究。 虽然国际上有指导方针,但本文专注于美国国际委员会,包括IRB的简要历史,教学和基于社区的参与性研究,IRB审查,IRB提交的提示,以及案例研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号