...
首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives in plant ecology, evolution and systematics >Response of clonal versus non-clonal herbs to disturbance: Different strategies revealed
【24h】

Response of clonal versus non-clonal herbs to disturbance: Different strategies revealed

机译:克隆与非克隆草药对干扰的反应:不同的策略揭示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Disturbance is an omnipresent selective factor that shapes plant strategies. While annual species that rely on rapid generative reproduction dominate in habitats frequently affected by severe disturbance, long-lived woody species occupy habitats where the effects of disturbance are weak. These are, however, the extremes in the disturbance gradient. Habitats under intermediate disturbance are occupied by the whole spectrum of plant strategies. In this study, we hypothesized that clonal herbs are better adapted to intermediate disturbance than non-clonal herbs because the characteristics of their bud bank and related belowground carbohydrate storage promote vegetative regeneration. In a greenhouse experiment, we tested the effects of disturbance on the survival and performance of 17 congeneric pairs of clonal and non-clonal herbs cultivated from seed. In addition to a non-disturbed control, we applied five disturbance treatments: biomass removal 2 cm above the soil surface, removal of 70 % of the aboveground biomass, late spring frost, flooding, and belowground injury. Mortality was negligible except the flooding treatment, where it was higher for non-clonal than for clonal plants. Total biomass was reduced more by the disturbance treatments for clonal than for non-clonal plants, suggesting that clonal species suffer more than non-clonal species. On the other hand, clonal plants had significantly greater total belowground biomass and R:S ratios than non-clonal plants, suggesting a strong investment in belowground organs by clonal plants. In response to disturbance, the SLA and SRL values increased in clonal plants but decreased in non-clonal plants, indicating that clonal and non-clonal plants differ in how they cope with disturbance. Although clonality is considered to be an adaptation to disturbance, our results indicate that, during the first year of life, clonal herbs are more sensitive to disturbance than non-clonal herbs, likely due to preferential investment in belowground biomass.
机译:干扰是一种塑造植物策略的无所不在的选择性因素。虽然依赖于经常受严重干扰影响的栖息地的快速生成繁殖的年度物种,但长寿的木质物种占据了干扰影响弱的栖息地。然而,这些是扰动梯度的极端。中间干扰下的栖息地被整个植物策略占据。在这项研究中,我们假设克隆草药更好地适应中间干扰,而不是非克隆草药,因为它们的芽组的特征和地下碳水化合物储存促进植物再生。在温室实验中,我们测试了扰动对17个基因克隆和非克隆药草的存活率和性能的影响。除了不受干扰的控制外,我们还应用了五种干扰治疗:生物质去除了土壤表面上方2厘米,除去70%的上错生物量,晚泉霜,洪水和地下损伤。除了洪水治疗外,死亡率可忽略不计,而非克隆的潜力较高比克隆植物更高。通过对非克隆植物的克隆的干扰处理,总生物质的总生物量更多地减少,表明克隆物种患有不克隆物种。另一方面,克隆植物总额低于地下生物量和r:S比非克隆植物的比例,表明克隆植物的低于地下器官的强大投资。响应于干扰,克隆植物中的SLA和SRL值增加,但在非克隆植物中减少,表明克隆和非克隆植物在它们如何应对干扰时不同。虽然克隆性被认为是对扰动的适应性,但我们的结果表明,在生命的第一年,克隆草药对扰动比非克隆草药更敏感,可能是由于在地下生物质的优惠投资。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号