首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture and Human Values >Lessons for farmer-oriented research: Experiences from a West African soil fertility management project
【24h】

Lessons for farmer-oriented research: Experiences from a West African soil fertility management project

机译:面向农民的研究的经验教训:西非土壤肥力管理项目的经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Donors, scientists and farmers all benefit when research and development projects have high impact. However, potential benefits are sometimes not realized. Our objective in this study is to determine why resource-poor farmers in Togo (declined to) adopt recommended practices that were promoted through a multi-organizational project on soil fertility management. We examine the processes and outcomes related to the adoption process. The project was undertaken in three villages in the Central Region of Togo in West Africa. The development and research processes that took place during the implementation of the project were critically analyzed using a conceptual framework that may be useful for improving the impact of future participatory projects. At the macro level, opportunities for innovation were not deliberately explored with participating farmers and other village members; consequently 'pre-analytical choices' made during the planning phase resulted in practices that resource-poor farmers were, for a variety of reasons, unable or unwilling to adopt. From the outset, donors and scientists focused on soil fertility management, but failed to take into account the wider economic context within which soil fertility management took place. This was a major obstacle to the subsequent adoption of recommended management strategies. Scientists and donor partners measured the success of the Project in terms of crop productivity, but farmers' choices were influenced by a complex mix of socio-economic, political and technical factors. We also illustrate the importance of selecting appropriate categories of farmers for a particular experiment. We conclude that for participatory research and development projects to be successful, it is not enough to develop technologies that 'work' in a technical sense. In order to be scaled up and widely implemented, such technologies must also meet a variety of needs of resource-poor farmers and be acceptable from a socio-cultural point of view.
机译:当研发项目产生重大影响时,捐助者,科学家和农民都将从中受益。但是,潜在的好处有时无法实现。本研究的目的是确定为什么多哥的资源贫乏的农民(拒绝采用)推荐的做法,该建议的做法是通过土壤肥力管理的一个多组织项目推广的。我们检查与采用过程相关的过程和结果。该项目是在西非多哥中部地区的三个村庄进行的。使用概念框架对项目实施过程中发生的开发和研究过程进行了批判性分析,这可能对改善未来参与项目的影响很有用。在宏观一级,没有与参与的农民和其他村民有意探索创新机会;因此,在计划阶段做出的“分析前选择”导致了实践,由于各种原因,资源贫乏的农民无法或不愿采用。从一开始,捐助者和科学家就专注于土壤肥力管理,但是没有考虑到土壤肥力管理的广泛经济背景。这是随后采用推荐的管理策略的主要障碍。科学家和捐助伙伴以作物生产力衡量了该项目的成功,但是农民的选择受到社会经济,政治和技术因素的综合影响。我们还说明了为特定实验选择合适类别的农民的重要性。我们得出结论,要使参与性研发项目取得成功,仅开发在技术意义上“行之有效”的技术是不够的。为了扩大规模并广泛实施,此类技术还必须满足资源贫乏农民的各种需求,并且从社会文化的角度来看是可以接受的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号