...
首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture and Human Values >Does certified organic farming reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural production? Comment on the McGee study
【24h】

Does certified organic farming reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural production? Comment on the McGee study

机译:经过认证的有机农业会减少农业生产中的温室气体排放吗?评论麦吉研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A recent study by McGee (Agriculture and Human Values, 32, 255-263, 2015) from the University of Oregon has led to discussions in international media and on the web. This study addresses an interesting question and applies advanced statistics for its analysis. However, we identify several methodological flaws that invalidate the results. First, McGee tests a hypothesis that does not correspond to his main question and which does not allow McGee to derive the conclusions that are drawn in his paper and reported in the media coverage. Second, the data used are not adequate for the analysis because: i) the dependent variable does not reflect the greenhouse gas emissions characteristics of organic agriculture (e.g. different emission factors in organic and conventional agriculture or avoidance of emissions from fertilizer production), ii) the explanatory variables neglect the livestock sector, and iii) trade aspects are missing. Third, McGee fails to discuss his findings in the light of quite a substantial body of experimental, bio-physical research from the US and elsewhere.
机译:俄勒冈大学的McGee最近进行的一项研究(农业与人类价值,32,255-263,2015)导致了国际媒体和网络上的讨论。这项研究解决了一个有趣的问题,并应用了高级统计数据进行分析。但是,我们发现了一些方法学缺陷,使结果无效。首先,McGee检验了一个假设,该假设与他的主要问题不符,并且该假设不允许McGee得出他在论文中得出并在媒体报道中得出的结论。其次,所使用的数据不足以进行分析,因为:i)因变量不能反映有机农业的温室气体排放特征(例如有机农业和常规农业的排放因子不同或避免了化肥生产的排放),ii)解释变量忽略了畜牧业,并且iii)缺少贸易方面。第三,鉴于美国和其他地区的大量实验性,生物物理研究,McGee无法讨论他的发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号