...
【24h】

Modelling interactions and feedback mechanisms between land use change and landscape processes

机译:建模土地利用变化与景观过程之间的相互作用和反馈机制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Land use changes and landscape processes are interrelated and influenced by multiple bio-physical and socio-economic driving factors, resulting in a complex, multi-scale system. Consequently in landscapes with active landscape processes such as erosion, land use changes should not be analysed in isolation without accounting for both on-site and off-site effects on landscape processes. To investigate the interactions between land use, land use change and landscape processes, a case study for the Alora region in southern Spain is carried out, coupling a land use change model (CLUE) and a landscape process model simulating water and tillage erosion and sedimentation (LAPSUS). First, both models are run independently for a baseline scenario of land use change. Secondly, different feedbacks are added to the coupled model framework as 'interaction scenarios'. Firstly effects of land use change on landscape processes are introduced by means of a 'changed erodibility feedback'. Secondly effects of landscape processes on land use are introduced stepwise: (i) an 'observed erosion feedback' where reallocation of land use results from farmers' perception of erosion features, and (ii) a 'reduced productivity feedback' whereby changes in soil depth result in a land use relocation. Quantities and spatial patterns of both land use change and soil redistribution are compared with the baseline scenario to assess the cumulative effect of including each of the interaction mechanisms in the modelling framework.Overall, total quantities of land use change (areas) and soil redistribution do not differ much for the different interaction scenarios. However, there are important differences in the spatial patterns of both land use and soil redistribution. In addition, by incorporating the perception and bio-physical feedback mechanisms, land use types with stable or increasing acreages are increasingly relocated from their original positions, suggesting a current location on landscape positions prone to soil erosion and sedimentation. Implementing the 'reduced productivity feedback' causes most of these effects. Another important outcome is that on-site land use changes trigger major off-site soil redistribution dynamics. These off-site effects are attributed to down slope or downstream changes in sediment transport rates and/or discharge caused by changes in land surface characteristics.The results of this study provide insight into the interactions between different processes occurring within landscapes and the influence of feedbacks on the development of the landscape. The interaction between processes goes across various spatial and temporal scales, leading to difficulties in linked model representation and calibration and validation of the coupled modelling system. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:土地利用变化和景观过程相互关联,并受到多种生物物理和社会经济驱动因素的影响,从而形成了一个复杂的,多尺度的系统。因此,在具有活跃的景观过程(例如侵蚀)的景观中,在不考虑现场对景观过程的现场和非现场影响的情况下,不应孤立地分析土地利用变化。为了研究土地利用,土地利用变化与景观过程之间的相互作用,以西班牙南部的阿罗拉地区为例,结合土地利用变化模型(CLUE)和模拟水和耕作侵蚀与沉降的景观过程模型进行了研究。 (LAPSUS)。首先,两个模型都是针对土地使用变化的基准情景独立运行的。其次,将不同的反馈作为“交互场景”添加到耦合模型框架。首先,通过“变化的侵蚀性反馈”来引入土地利用变化对景观过程的影响。其次,逐步介绍了景观过程对土地利用的影响:(i)“观察到的侵蚀反馈”,其中土地使用的重新分配来自农民对侵蚀特征的感知,以及(ii)“降低的生产力反馈”,其中土壤深度的变化导致土地使用搬迁。将土地利用变化和土壤再分配的数量和空间格局与基准情景进行比较,以评估将每个相互作用机制纳入模型框架的累积效应。总体而言,土地利用变化(面积)和土壤再分配的总量对于不同的交互方案,相差不大。但是,土地利用和土壤再分配的空间格局存在重要差异。此外,通过结合感知和生物物理反馈机制,具有稳定或增加种植面积的土地利用类型越来越多地从其原始位置转移,这表明当前位于易于土壤侵蚀和沉积的景观位置。实施“降低的生产率反馈”会导致大多数这些影响。另一个重要的结果是,现场土地利用的变化触发了主要的场外土壤再分配动态。这些异地影响归因于由于地表特征变化而引起的下坡或下游泥沙输送速率和/或流量的变化。本研究的结果提供了对景观内不同过程之间的相互作用以及反馈影响的了解。关于景观的发展。过程之间的交互作用跨越各种时空尺度,导致链接模型表示以及耦合建模系统的校准和验证困难。 (C)2008 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号