...
首页> 外文期刊>Palliative medicine >Utilization and determinants of palliative care in the trauma intensive care unit: Results of a national survey
【24h】

Utilization and determinants of palliative care in the trauma intensive care unit: Results of a national survey

机译:创伤强度护理单位中姑息治疗的利用与决定因素:国家调查结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: There is a paucity of data evaluating utilization of palliative care in trauma intensive care units. Aim: We sought to determine current indications and determinants of palliative care consultation in the trauma intensive care units. Design: Using a cross-sectional assessment, we surveyed trauma surgeons to understand indications, benefits, and barriers trauma surgeons perceive when consulting palliative care.Setting/participants: A total of 1232 surveys were emailed to all members of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Results: A total of 362 providers responded (29% response rate). Majority of respondents were male (n = 287, 80.2%) and practiced in Level I (n = 278, 77.7%) trauma centers. Most common indicators for referral to palliative care were expected survival I week to I month, multisystem organ dysfunction >3 weeks, minimal neurologic responsiveness > I week, and referral to hospice. In post hoc analysis, there was a significant difference in frequency of utilization of palliative care when respondents had access to board-certified palliative care physicians (x2 = 56.4, p < 0.001). Although half of the respondents (n = 199, 55.6%) reported palliative care consults beneficial all or most of the time, nearly still half (n = 174,48.6%) felt palliative care was underutilized. Most frequent barriers to consultation included resistance from families (n = 144, 40.2%), concerns that physicians were "giving up" (n = 109, 30.4%), and miscommunication of prognosis (n = 98, 27.4%) or diagnosis (n = 58, 16.2%) by the palliative care physician.Conclusion: Although a plurality of trauma surgeons reported palliative care beneficial, those surveyed indicate that palliative care is underutilized. Barriers identified provide important opportunities to further appropriate utilization of palliative care services.
机译:背景:在创伤密集护理单位中存在姑息治疗的利用数据评估。目的:我们试图确定创伤密集护理单位中姑息治疗咨询的当前指征和决定因素。设计:使用横断面评估,在咨询姑息治疗时,我们调查了创伤外科医生以了解创伤,福利和障碍创伤问题创伤性问题。诱捕/参与者:全部向东方协会的所有成员发送了1232名调查,给了外科术语的所有成员创伤。结果:共有362个提供商响应(响应率为29%)。大多数受访者是男性(n = 287,80.2%),在I级(n = 278,77.7%)的创伤中心。最常见的指标用于姑息治疗的姑息治疗预期I周给I个月,多系统器官功能障碍> 3周,最小的神经系统响应性> I周,以及临终关怀转诊。在HOC分析中,当受访者访问董事会认证的姑息医疗医生(X2 = 56.4,P <0.001)时,姑息治疗的利用率频率有显着差异(X2 = 56.4,P <0.001)。虽然有一半的受访者(n = 199,55.6%)报告姑息治疗咨询有益的所有或大部分时间,几乎仍然是一半(n = 174,48.6%)感觉姑息治疗未充分利用。咨询的最常见的障碍包括家庭的抵抗力(n = 144,40.2%),担心医生“放弃”(n = 109,30.4%),并误解预后(n = 98,27.4%)或诊断(姑息治疗医师N = 58,16.2%)。结论:虽然多个创伤外科医生报告了姑息治疗有益,但那些调查表明姑息治疗未充分利用。障碍所确定的障碍提供了进一步适当利用姑息治疗服务的重要机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号