...
首页> 外文期刊>Palliative medicine >Utilization and determinants of palliative care in the trauma intensive care unit: Results of a national survey
【24h】

Utilization and determinants of palliative care in the trauma intensive care unit: Results of a national survey

机译:创伤重症监护病房姑息治疗的利用和决定因素:一项全国调查的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: There is a paucity of data evaluating utilization of palliative care in trauma intensive care units. Aim: We sought to determine current indications and determinants of palliative care consultation in the trauma intensive care units. Design: Using a cross-sectional assessment, we surveyed trauma surgeons to understand indications, benefits, and barriers trauma surgeons perceive when consulting palliative care.Setting/participants: A total of 1232 surveys were emailed to all members of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Results: A total of 362 providers responded (29% response rate). Majority of respondents were male (n = 287, 80.2%) and practiced in Level I (n = 278, 77.7%) trauma centers. Most common indicators for referral to palliative care were expected survival I week to I month, multisystem organ dysfunction >3 weeks, minimal neurologic responsiveness > I week, and referral to hospice. In post hoc analysis, there was a significant difference in frequency of utilization of palliative care when respondents had access to board-certified palliative care physicians (x2 = 56.4, p < 0.001). Although half of the respondents (n = 199, 55.6%) reported palliative care consults beneficial all or most of the time, nearly still half (n = 174,48.6%) felt palliative care was underutilized. Most frequent barriers to consultation included resistance from families (n = 144, 40.2%), concerns that physicians were "giving up" (n = 109, 30.4%), and miscommunication of prognosis (n = 98, 27.4%) or diagnosis (n = 58, 16.2%) by the palliative care physician.Conclusion: Although a plurality of trauma surgeons reported palliative care beneficial, those surveyed indicate that palliative care is underutilized. Barriers identified provide important opportunities to further appropriate utilization of palliative care services.
机译:背景:缺乏数据评估创伤重症监护病房使用姑息治疗的情况。目的:我们试图确定创伤重症监护病房中姑息治疗咨询的当前适应症和决定因素。设计:我们采用横断面评估方法对创伤外科医师进行了调查,以了解创伤外科医师在咨询姑息治疗时会发现的适应症,益处和障碍背景/参与者:总共有1232项调查问卷通过电子邮件发送给了东方外科协会的所有成员创伤结果:共有362位提供者做出了回应(回应率为29%)。多数受访者为男性(n = 287,80.2%),并在一级创伤中心(n = 278,77.7%)进行了练习。推荐给姑息治疗的最常见指标是:预期生存时间:1周至1个月;多系统器官功能障碍> 3周;最小的神经系统反应性:> 1周;以及转诊至临终关怀医院。在事后分析中,当受访者能够获得董事会认证的姑息治疗医生使用姑息治疗的频率存在显着差异(x2 = 56.4,p <0.001)。尽管有一半的受访者(n = 199,55.6%)表示姑息治疗在所有或大部分时间都向有益患者咨询,但仍有近一半的受访者(n = 174,48.6%)感到姑息治疗未得到充分利用。咨询的最常见障碍包括家庭的抵制(n = 144,40.2%),担心医生“放弃”(n = 109,30.4%),以及对预后的误解(n = 98,27.4%)或诊断( n = 58,16.2%)由姑息治疗医师提供。结论:尽管许多创伤外科医师表示姑息治疗有益,但接受调查的人均表示姑息治疗未得到充分利用。确定的障碍为进一步适当利用姑息治疗服务提供了重要机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号