...
【24h】

Tillage impact on soil erosion by water: Discrepancies due to climate and soil characteristics

机译:耕作对水土流失的影响:气候和土壤特征造成的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

No-tillage (NT) is promoted for soil and water conservation, but research findings on overland flow and soil erosion are inconsistent across different ecosystems, with some studies showing no benefits of NT over conventional tillage (CT). A global literature review was conducted to quantify the impact of NT on water runoff, sediment concentration and soil losses. The objective was to identify the underlying causes of the variability in the performance of NT across different environments. Data from 282 paired NT and CT runoff plots from 41 research studies worldwide were analysed using meta-analysis and principal component analysis (PCA). Sediment concentration and soil losses were 56 and 60% lower under NT than CT, respectively. These tended to be greater under CT than NT on long plots (90% for sediment concentration and 94% for soil losses) and steepest slopes (79 and 77%, respectively). Greater differences in sediment concentration and soil losses between NT and CT were observed in low clay soils and under temperate climates. While on average there were no differences on runoff coefficient, NT decreased runoff coefficient by about 40% compared to CT in mulched soils, under cool climate (10 degrees C), and for experiments done >5 years. Overall, the results indicated that NT has greater potential to reduce runoff and soil losses in temperate regions where soils of peri-glacial influence are relatively young, moderately weathered and fragile compared to the heavily weathered clayey tropical soils that are well aggregated and less erodible. The results of this study are expected to inform scientists, practitioners and policy makers on the links between land management and soil functioning processes. Policy makers and development implementers will be able to make informed choices of land management techniques for effective NT implementation, for instance by having more mulch input under warm climates. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:提倡免耕(NT)进行水土保持,但是在不同生态系统中关于陆坡流量和土壤侵蚀的研究结果不一致,一些研究表明,NT不比常规耕作(CT)有任何好处。进行了一项全球文献综述,以量化NT对水径流,沉积物浓度和土壤流失的影响。目的是确定跨不同环境的NT性能变化的根本原因。使用荟萃分析和主成分分析(PCA)分析了来自全球41个研究的282对成对的NT和CT径流图的数据。在NT下,沉积物浓度和土壤流失分别比CT低56%和60%。在长距离样地(沉积物浓度为90%,土壤流失为94%)和最陡坡度(分别为79%和77%)下,在CT下这些趋势倾向于大于NT。在低黏土和温带气候下,NT和CT之间的沉积物浓度和土壤流失差异更大。虽然平均而言,径流系数没有差异,但在覆盖的土壤中,在凉爽气候(<10摄氏度)和进行了超过5年的实验中,NT与CT相比,径流系数降低了约40%。总体而言,结果表明,与聚集度高,易侵蚀的强风化黏土热带土壤相比,在沿冰川作用的土壤相对年轻,气候适度和脆弱的温带地区,NT具有更大的潜力来减少径流和土壤流失。预期这项研究的结果将使科学家,从业人员和政策制定者了解土地管理与土壤功能过程之间的联系。政策制定者和发展实施者将能够在土地管理技术方面做出明智的选择,以有效实施土地管理,例如,在温暖的气候下增加土地覆盖的投入。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号