...
首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment: An International Journal for Scientific Research on the Relationship of Agriculture and Food Production to the Biosphere >Impact of integrated sheep grazing for cover crop termination on weed and ground beetle (Coleoptera:Carabidae) communities
【24h】

Impact of integrated sheep grazing for cover crop termination on weed and ground beetle (Coleoptera:Carabidae) communities

机译:综合放牧以终止农作物对杂草和甲虫(鞘翅目:甲虫)群落的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cover crops are a suite of non-marketable plant species grown to improve soil quality. They may have additional benefits including reduced weed pressure and enhanced habitat for beneficial arthropods, but they do not provide direct revenue. Integrating sheep grazing for cover crop termination could make the use of cover crops more economically feasible. However, if grazing shifts biological communities to assemblages of less desired species, producers are unlikely to use this method of cover crop termination. We compared weed and carabid beetle (Coleoptera:Carabidae) communities between cover crops terminated by sheep grazing and those terminated by mowing. Our study consisted of two trials of a two-phase experiment. In the first phase (cover crop phase), we seeded a four-species cover crop to enhance nutrient cycling and prevent erosion. The cover crop consisted of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum), sweetclover (Melilotus officinalis), beets (Beta vulgaris), and peas (Pisum sativum). The cover crop grew to anthesis, and was terminated by either sheep grazing or mowing. In the second phase (cash crop phase), we sowed three cash crops through the previously grazed or mowed plots to assess legacy impacts of cover crop termination strategies on weed community structure. Both years, weed species richness and biomass were greater prior to than after cover crop termination, but overall weed diversity, species richness, and biomass did not differ between grazed and mowed plots. We found no difference in weed diversity, species richness, biomass, or density in the cash-crop phase between previously grazed and mowed plots. Despite temporal differences in species richness and activity-density, carabid diversity, species richness, and activity-density did not differ between grazed and mowed plots. Overall, our results suggest that grazing and mowing act as similar ecological filters of both weed and carabid beetle communities. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:覆盖作物是为改善土壤质量而种植的一组不可出售的植物。它们可能具有其他好处,包括降低杂草压力和增加有益节肢动物的栖息地,但它们并不能提供直接收益。将绵羊放牧纳入终止遮盖作物的做法,可以使遮盖作物的使用在经济上更加可行。但是,如果放牧将生物群落转变为不太理想的物种,生产者不太可能使用这种遮盖作物的方法。我们比较了在以绵羊放牧终止的有盖作物和以割草终止的有盖作物之间的杂草和甲虫(鞘翅目:甲壳纲)群落。我们的研究包括两个阶段的两个试验。在第一阶段(覆盖作物阶段),我们播种了四种有盖作物,以增强养分循环并防止侵蚀。覆盖作物由荞麦(Fagopyrum esculentum),甜三叶草(Melilotus officinalis),甜菜(Beta vulgaris)和豌豆(Pisum sativum)组成。覆被作物长成花序,并因放牧或割草而终止。在第二阶段(经济作物阶段),我们通过先前放牧或割下的地块播种了三种经济作物,以评估覆盖作物终止策略对杂草群落结构的传统影响。两年间,杂草物种丰富度和生物量都比被覆作物终止前要高,但放牧和割草地的杂草多样性,物种丰富度和生物量总体上没有差异。我们发现以前放牧和割草的田间,在经济作物阶段杂草的多样性,物种丰富度,生物量或密度没有差异。尽管在物种丰富度和活动密度方面存在时间差异,但放牧地和割草地之间的腕足多样性,物种丰富度和活动密度没有差异。总体而言,我们的结果表明,放牧和割草是杂草和甲虫群落的类似生态过滤器。 (C)2015由Elsevier B.V.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号