...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain medicine : >Preliminary Validation of a Two-Point Estimation Task for the Measurement of Sensory Dissociation in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain
【24h】

Preliminary Validation of a Two-Point Estimation Task for the Measurement of Sensory Dissociation in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain

机译:两点估计任务对慢性低腰疼痛患者感觉解离的两点估计任务的初步验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives. Sensory dissociation (SEDI), the discrepancy between perception and actual size or shape of a painful body part, is a frequently observed finding in patients with chronic low back pain. However, the current methods of evaluating SEDI have several limitations, such as a qualitative nature and weak evidence supporting their reliability. In the current study, the reliability of two versions (manual and verbal) of a novel test, a two-point estimation task (TPE), was investigated. Methods. To perform the manual version of the task, patients estimated the distance between two tactile stimuli delivered to their back using callipers, whereas in the verbal version they verbally reported the estimated distance. Results. The manual version of TPE showed greater interexaminer reliability than the verbal version, and the mean of the two repeated measurements was sufficient for reaching excellent reliability for the pain-free (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.77-0.97) and painful (ICC = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.65-0.94) sides. Intra-examiner reliability was moderate to excellent (ICC = 0.66-0.96) for the manual version performed at the pain-free and painful sides. Distribution, duration, and intensity of pain significantly predicted SEDI and accounted for 42% of the total variance (corrected R-2 = 0.42, P<0.01). Conclusions. TPE showed higher reliability coefficients compared with tools previously suggested in the literature and can therefore be used clinically and experimentally by one or more examiners. Further research is required to investigate the validity of this new test.
机译:目标。感官解离(SEDI),感知和疼痛体系的实际尺寸或形状之间的差异是慢性低腰疼痛患者的经常观察到的发现。然而,目前评估SEDI的方法具有几个限制,例如质量性质和支持其可靠性的弱点。在目前的研究中,研究了新型测试的两个版本(手动和口头)的可靠性,这是一个两点估计任务(TPE)。方法。为了执行手动版本的任务,患者估计使用卡尺向其背部递送的两个触觉刺激之间的距离,而在口头版本中,他们口头报告了估计距离。结果。 TPE的手动版本显示出比口头版本更大的Interexaminer可靠性,并且两个重复测量的平均值足以使无痛(脑内相关系数[ICC] = 0.91,95%置信区间[CI]达到优异的可靠性= 0.77-0.97)疼痛(ICC = 0.86,95%CI = 0.65-0.94)。在无痛和疼痛的侧面执行的手动版本,检查器内部可靠性适度至优异的(ICC = 0.66-0.96)。疼痛的分布,持续时间和强度显着预测SEDI,占总方差的42%(R-2 = 0.42,P <0.01)。结论。 TPE显示出更高的可靠性系数与先前在文献中提出的工具相比,因此可以通过一个或多个审查员在临床上和实验中使用。需要进一步研究来调查新测试的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号