...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain management nursing: official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses >A Canadian Survey of Self-Management Strategies and Satisfaction with Ability to Control Pain: Comparison of Community Dwelling Adults with Neuropathic Pain versus Adults with Non-neuropathic Chronic Pain
【24h】

A Canadian Survey of Self-Management Strategies and Satisfaction with Ability to Control Pain: Comparison of Community Dwelling Adults with Neuropathic Pain versus Adults with Non-neuropathic Chronic Pain

机译:加拿大自我管理策略和控制痛能力的满意度:社区居住成年人与非神经病慢性疼痛的成年人的社区居住成年人的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Individuals with chronic pain with neuropathic characteristics (CPNC) describe a different pain experience compared with those with chronic pain without neuropathic characteristics (CP). Aims: The aim of this study was to describe and compare pain, self-management strategies, and satisfaction with ability to control pain between adults with CPNC versus CP. Participants: Seven hundred and ten community-dwelling adults with chronic pain participated in a cross-sectional survey. Methods: CPNC was defined as a score ≥12 on the Self-Report Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Pain Scale. Self-management and pain control was compared between participants with CPNC and CP using frequency, percent, relative risk (RR), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Participants with CPNC (188/710) reported lower socioeconomic status, poorer general health, and more intense, frequent, and widespread pain. They were more likely to use prescription medications to manage pain (adjusted OR?=?2.25, CI?=?1.47-3.42). They were more likely to use potentially negative strategies to ease the emotional burden of living with chronic pain, including substance use (adjusted OR?=?1.58, CI?=?1.06-2.35), denial (adjusted OR?=?2.21, CI?=?1.49-3.28), and behavioral disengagement (adjusted OR?=?1.68, CI?=?1.16-2.45), and they were more likely to be completely dissatisfied with their ability to control pain (RR?=?1.77, CI?=?1.21-2.58). Conclusions: Individuals with CPNC have distinct pain and self-management experiences compared with those with CP that may lead to negative coping strategies and dissatisfaction with ability to control pain. Therefore, self-management assessment and support should be tailored by pain condition.
机译:背景:患有神经性特征(CPNC)的慢性疼痛的个体描述了与没有神经化特征(CP)的慢性疼痛的人相比的不同疼痛体验。目的:本研究的目的是描述和比较疼痛,自我管理策略和满足能力控制患有CPNC与CP的成年人疼痛的能力。参与者:七百十个社区住宅,慢性疼痛参加了一个横断面调查。方法:CPNC定义为自我报告LEEDS评估神经病变症状的评分≥12并签署疼痛量表。使用CPNC和CP的参与者使用频率,百分比,相对风险(RR),差异比率(ORS)和95%置信区间(CIS)之间进行自我管理和疼痛控制。结果:CPNC(188/710)的参与者报告了较低的社会经济地位,普通普通健康,更强烈,频繁,普遍存在的痛苦。它们更有可能使用处方药来管理疼痛(调整或?=?2.25,CI?1.47-3.42)。他们更有可能使用潜在的负面策略来缓解慢性疼痛的情绪负担,包括物质使用(调整或?=?1.58,CI?1.1.06-2.35),否认(调整或?=?2.21,CI ?=?1.49-3.28)和行为脱离(调整或?=?1.68,CI?=?1.16-2.45),它们更可能完全不满意他们控制疼痛的能力(RR?= 1.77, ci?=?1.21-2.58)。结论:与CP的CPNC有不同的痛苦和自我管理经验,与CP可能导致负面应对策略和对控制疼痛的能力的不满,有不同的痛苦和自我管理经验。因此,应通过疼痛状况量身定制自我管理评估和支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号