...
首页> 外文期刊>Pancreatology: official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] >Interventions for walled off necrosis using an algorithm based endoscopic step-up approach: Outcomes in a large cohort of patients
【24h】

Interventions for walled off necrosis using an algorithm based endoscopic step-up approach: Outcomes in a large cohort of patients

机译:基于内窥镜升压方法的算法:大衔接群体的围绕围绕坏死的干预措施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Objectives The minimally invasive step-up approach for treatment of walled off necrosis (WON) involves drainage followed by later necrosectomy as needed, and is superior to primary surgical necrosectomy. Reported series of endoscopic transluminal necrosectomy include highly selected patients. We report outcomes of a large series of patients with WON managed by an algorithm based on an endoscopically centered step-up approach. Methods Consecutive patients with necrotizing pancreatitis from 2009 to 2014, with intervention only for infected or persistently symptomatic WON. The primary approach involved endoscopic transluminal drainage plus minus necrosectomy whenever feasible, with percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) plus minus sinus tract endoscopy if not feasible or sufficient. Surgery was reserved for failures of the step up approach. Results Of 109 consecutive patients with necrotizing pancreatitis, intervention was required in 83, including endoscopic transluminal drainage in 73 (88%) (alone in 49 and combined with PCD in 24), and PCD alone in 10 (12%). 64 (77%) of the 83 patients required endoscopic transluminal and/or sinus tract necrosectomy. Adverse events occurred in 11 (13%). Three patients (4%) failed step up approach and required open surgical necrosectomy. All-cause mortality occurred in 6 (7%) of 83 patients after intervention, including 2 of 3 requiring surgery. Conclusions An algorithm based step-up approach for interventions in necrotizing pancreatitis using primarily endoscopic techniques with adjunctive percutaneous approaches as needed resulted in favorable outcomes with small numbers proceeding to open surgery, and with acceptable rates of major complications and mortality. A purely endoscopic transluminal approach was feasible in approximately 60% of patients requiring intervention in this series.
机译:摘要目的,围墙偏离坏死(韩元)的微创升级方法涉及排水,然后根据需要进行肮脏的墓穴,并且优于初级外科墓穴切除术。报告的内窥镜腔正交切除术系列包括高度选择的患者。我们报告了一系列基于内窥镜中心的升压方法的算法赢得奖励的一系列患者的结果。方法从2009年到2014年的死亡胰腺炎的连续患者,干预仅供感染或持续症状。每当可行的情况下,主要方法涉及内窥镜腔翻膜排水加上减去死亡切除术,具有经皮导管引流(PCD)加上减去鼻窦内窥镜检查,如果不可行或足够。手术被保留用于加紧方法的失败。结果109例患有坏死性胰腺炎的患者,在83中需要干预,包括73(88%)中的内窥镜分子引流(仅在49中单独使用,24中与PCD合并),仅在10(12%)中。 83例(77%)的83名患者需要内窥镜腔室和/或窦道坏死切除术。不良事件发生在11(13%)。三名患者(4%)上升性失败,需要开放的外科虐待术。干预后的83名患者的6(7%)发生全导致死亡率,其中3例需要手术。结论基于基于算法的基于算法,​​其使用主要内窥镜技术在需要内窥镜炎的情况下,需要根据需要进行辅助经皮方法,导致较少的缺点与少数进行开放手术,以及具有可接受的主要并发症和死亡率的速率。在该系列中需要干预的大约60%的患者中,纯粹的内窥镜腔室方法是可行的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号