首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment: An International Journal for Scientific Research on the Relationship of Agriculture and Food Production to the Biosphere >Nitrogen mass balances in conventional, integrated and ecological croppingsystems and the relationship between balance calculations and nitrogenrunoff in an 8-year field experiment in Norway
【24h】

Nitrogen mass balances in conventional, integrated and ecological croppingsystems and the relationship between balance calculations and nitrogenrunoff in an 8-year field experiment in Norway

机译:在挪威进行的为期8年的田间试验中,常规,综合和生态作物系统中的氮素质量平衡以及平衡计算与氮素径流之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For a cropping system to be sustainable, should not only the soil nitrogen (N) content be preserved but also the N runoff be minimised. Finding a simple but robust way to estimate N runoff would thus be a great advantage when evaluating cropping systems. In this study all major N flows in six different cropping systems, each covering 0.18 ha of a separately pipe drained field lysimeter, located in southeast Norway, were either measured or estimated over a period of X-years. The effect of the cropping system on the soil N content was evaluated using mass balances of total N, and the usefulness of such N balances to predict N runoff(total N losses via drainage and surface water) was investigated. The experiment included systems with conventional arable cropping (CON-A), integrated arable-cropping (INT-A), ecological arable cropping (ECO-A), conventional forage cropping (CON-F), integrated forage cropping (I:VT-F), and ecological forage cropping (ECO-F). All the arable cropping systems resulted in a net reduction in the calculated soil N pool, and the reduction increased with decreasing N input. The only system, which did not alter the soil N content, war; CON-E The largest net reduction was estimated fur EGO-A and ECO-F, which averaged 45 and 43 kg N ha(-1) per year, respectively. The N runoff from the systems was in the range of 18-35 kg N ha(-1) per year, with highest losses from the two conventional and lowest from the two ecological systems and INT-E The forage systems had lower N runoff than the arable systems. The INT-F system appeared to be the most favourable system in terms of both soil N balance and N runoff.
机译:为了使耕作制度具有可持续性,不仅应保留土壤中的氮(N)含量,而且应尽量减少氮素径流。因此,在评估种植系统时,找到一种简单而可靠的方法来估算氮径流量将是一个很大的优势。在这项研究中,对六个不同种植系统中的所有主要氮流量进行了测量或估算,这些测量系统均在X年内进行了测量或估算,这些系统分别覆盖位于挪威东南部的0.18公顷的单独管道排水的田间溶渗仪。使用总氮的质量平衡评估了种植系统对土壤氮含量的影响,并研究了这种氮平衡对预测氮径流量(通过排水和地表水的总氮损失)的有用性。该实验包括采用常规耕作(CON-A),综合耕作(INT-A),生态耕作(ECO-A),常规饲草(CON-F),综合饲草(I:VT- F)和生态饲草种植(ECO-F)。所有可耕作耕作制度导致计算出的土壤氮库净减少,且减少量随着氮输入的减少而增加。唯一不改变土壤氮含量的系统是战争。 CON-E估计最大的净减少量是EGO-A和ECO-F,分别平均每年45和43 kg N ha(-1)。该系统的氮径流量每年在18-35 kg N ha(-1)范围内,两个常规系统的最高损失,两个生态系统和INT-E的损失最低。饲草系统的氮径流量低于耕种制度。就土壤氮平衡和氮径流量而言,INT-F系统似乎是最有利的系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号