首页> 外文期刊>Systematic Biology >Probabilistic Species Tree Distances: Implementing the Multispecies Coalescent to Compare Species Trees Within the Same Model-Based Framework Used to Estimate Them
【24h】

Probabilistic Species Tree Distances: Implementing the Multispecies Coalescent to Compare Species Trees Within the Same Model-Based Framework Used to Estimate Them

机译:概率物种树距离:实现多数播放,以比较物种树在与估计它们的相同模型的框架内

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite the ubiquitous use of statistical models for phylogenomic and population genomic inferences, this model-based rigor is rarely applied to post hoc comparison of trees. In a recent study, Garba et al. derived new methods for measuring the distance between two gene trees computed as the difference in their site pattern probability distributions. Unlike traditional metrics that compare trees solely in terms of geometry, these measures consider gene trees and associated parameters as probabilistic models that can be compared using standard information theoretic approaches. Consequently, probabilistic measures of phylogenetic tree distance can be far more informative than simply comparisons of topology and/or branch lengths alone. However, in their current form, these distance measures are not suitable for the comparison of species tree models in the presence of gene tree heterogeneity. Here, we demonstrate an approach for how the theory of Garba et al. (2018), which is based on gene tree distances, can be extended naturally to the comparison of species tree models. Multispecies coalescent (MSC) models parameterize the discrete probability distribution of gene trees conditioned upon a species tree with a particular topology and set of divergence times (in coalescent units), and thus provide a framework for measuring distances between species tree models in terms of their corresponding gene tree topology probabilities. We describe the computation of probabilistic species tree distances in the context of standard MSC models, which assume complete genetic isolation postspeciation, as well as recent theoretical extensions to the MSC in the form of network-based MSC models that relax this assumption and permit hybridization among taxa. We demonstrate these metrics using simulations and empirical species tree estimates and discuss both the benefits and limitations of these approaches. We make our species tree distance approach available as an R package called pSTDistanceR, for open use by the community.
机译:尽管使用统计模型的统计模型和群体基因组推论,但这种基于模型的严格很少适用于树木后的树木的比较。在最近的一项研究中,Garba等人。派生的新方法用于测量计算为其站点模式概率分布的差异的两个基因树之间的距离。与仅在几何形状方面比较树木的传统指标不同,这些措施将基因树和相关参数视为可以使用标准信息理论方法进行比较的概率模型。因此,系统发育树距离的概率测量比单独的拓扑和/或分支长度的简单比较可以更有信息。然而,在其目前的形式中,这些距离测量不适用于在基因树异质性存在下进行物种树模型的比较。在这里,我们证明了Garba等人的理论如何。 (2018),基于基因树距离,可以自然地扩展到物种树模型的比较。 MultiSpecies CoalESCEFES(MSC)模型用特定拓扑结构和一组分歧装置(在结段单元中)参数化基因树的离散概率分布,从而提供了一种用于测量物种树模型之间的距离的框架相应的基因树拓扑概率。我们描述了在标准MSC模型的上下文中的概率物种树距离的计算,它假设完全遗传隔离术后,以及以网络为基础的MSC模型的近期理论延伸,可以放宽这种假设并允许杂交分类群。我们使用模拟和经验物种树估计展示这些指标,并讨论了这些方法的益处和限制。我们使我们的物种树距离方法可用作一个名为PSTDistancer的R包,用于社区的开放使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号