首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment: An International Journal for Scientific Research on the Relationship of Agriculture and Food Production to the Biosphere >From adoption claims to understanding farmers and contexts: a literature review of Conservation Agriculture (CA) adoption among smallholder farmers in southern Africa. (Special Issue: Evaluating conservation agriculture for small scale farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.)
【24h】

From adoption claims to understanding farmers and contexts: a literature review of Conservation Agriculture (CA) adoption among smallholder farmers in southern Africa. (Special Issue: Evaluating conservation agriculture for small scale farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.)

机译:从收养主张到对农民和背景的理解:对南部非洲小农户收养保护性农业的文献回顾。 (特刊:评估撒哈拉以南非洲和南亚小农的保护性农业。)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This literature review of Conservation Agriculture (CA) adoption among smallholder farmers in southern Africa (Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe) analyses the historical background of the upsurge in CA promotion, the various definitions of CA that have emerged since the 1990s, the barriers to its adoption, as well as uptake figures and adoption studies. First tested as soil and water conservation measures, large-scale promotion followed a reframing of CA as a production-enhancing set of practices. Different definitions of what constitutes and is promoted as CA in southern Africa complicates the assessment of adoption across the region, while a commonly used, reductionist notion of CA adoption - as the uptake of minimum tillage - in adoption data collection, casts doubts on the validity of adoption figures. As CA uptake is often also incentivized by means of input support (fertilizers, seeds, herbicides) provided by promotional projects, adoption claims have limited value. Current CA adoption studies are methodologically weak as they are biased by the promotional project context in which are carried out, and build on farm-scale analyses of standard household surveys. A more thorough analysis of farming households and their resource allocation strategies is required to understand the farm-level adoption constraints different types of farmers face. As contextual factors appear key influences on smallholders' farming practices, studies focusing on the wider market, institutional and policy context are also needed if we are to understand (limited) CA adoption in southern Africa.
机译:这篇有关南部非洲(马拉维,赞比亚和津巴布韦)小农户采用保护性农业的文献综述分析了推广CA的热潮的历史背景,自1990年代以来出现的各种CA定义,阻碍其发展的障碍。收养以及吸收数据和收养研究。最初作为水土保持措施进行了测试,随后大规模推广,随后将CA改组为可提高生产能力的做法。在南部非洲,CA的构成和推广方式的不同定义使整个地区的收养评估变得复杂,而收养数据收集中普遍采用的减少主义的CA收养概念(即最小耕作的吸收量)使人们对有效性产生怀疑。收养数字。由于经常通过促销项目提供的投入支持(肥料,种子,除草剂)来激励CA的吸收,因此采用声称的价值有限。当前的CA采纳研究在方法论上很薄弱,因为它们受到进行的促销项目环境的偏见,并建立在对标准家庭调查的农场规模分析的基础上。需要对农户及其资源分配策略进行更透彻的分析,以了解不同类型农民所面临的农户采用水平的限制。由于背景因素似乎对小农户的耕作方式产生关键影响,因此,如果我们要了解(有限的)在南部非洲采用CA,也需要针对更广泛的市场,制度和政策背景的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号