...
首页> 外文期刊>Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer >The association of socioeconomic status with quality of life in cancer patients over a 6-month period using individual growth models
【24h】

The association of socioeconomic status with quality of life in cancer patients over a 6-month period using individual growth models

机译:社会经济地位与癌症患者生活质量的协会,在6个月内使用个体增长模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PurposeStudies examining longitudinal associations between socioeconomic factors and quality of life (QoL) in cancer patients are rare. This study investigates changes in QoL over a 6-month period.MethodsFour hundred forty-two cancer patients (mean age 64, SD=11, 70% male) completed standardized questionnaires at the beginning (t1) and end (t2) of their hospital stay and 3 (t3) and 6months (t4) thereafter. QoL was assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30 core questionnaire. Mixed effect models were employed to analyze individual changes in QoL in relation to socioeconomic status (education, income, job status) over the four timepoints. Age, sex, cohabitation, disease and treatment factors, and comorbidity were included as covariates in the models.ResultsIncome was a predictive factor for QoL. Patients with a low income had 8.8 percentage points (PP) lower physical, 4.9 PP lower emotional, and 11.4 PP lower role functioning. They also had 6.6 PP lower global QoL. Lower social functioning (6.2 PP) was found in patients with higher education or university degrees compared with those who were less educated or had not undergone an apprenticeship. Income also influenced trajectories of role functioning. There was no evidence that primary or secondary education and job type were related to QoL.ConclusionsThe fact that income is negatively associated with many aspects of quality of life should be considered during and after treatment with a focus on patients with special needs.
机译:癌症患者的社会经济因素和生活质量(QOL)之间的纵向协会罕见的用具。本研究调查了6个月内QoL的变化。一百四十二次癌症患者(平均64,SD = 11,70%男性)在其医院的开始(T1)和结束(T2)中完成了标准化问卷之后,保持和3(T3)和6个月(T4)。用EORTC QLQ-C30核心问卷评估QOL。使用混合效果模型来分析与四个监视期间的社会经济地位(教育,收入,工作状态)有关QOL的个体变化。年龄,性别,同居,疾病和治疗因子,和合并症被包括在模型中的协变量。方法是QOL的预测因素。收入低8.8个百分点(PP)的物理,4.9 pp情绪低下,11.4 pp较低的作用。他们还有6.6 PP较低的全球QOL。与那些受过教育或未经历学徒的人相比,在高等教育或大学学位的患者中发现了较低的社交功能(6.2 pp)。收入也影响了角色运作的轨迹。没有证据表明,小学或中学教育和工作类型与QOL相关.Conclusionsthe事实,收入与生活质量的许多方面负相关,应在治疗期间和之后进行治疗,以重点关注具有特殊需求的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号