首页> 外文期刊>Surgical oncology >Vulvo-vaginal reconstruction after radical excision for treatment of vulvar cancer: Evaluation of feasibility and morbidity of different surgical techniques
【24h】

Vulvo-vaginal reconstruction after radical excision for treatment of vulvar cancer: Evaluation of feasibility and morbidity of different surgical techniques

机译:外阴外切除治疗外阴癌的外阴 - 阴道重建:不同手术技术的可行性和发病率评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Vulvar cancer is a rare disease accounting for approximately 5% of female genital tract tumors worldwide. Currently surgery represents the mainstay alone or sometimes, in combination with chemo-radiotherapy, for locally advanced tumors and recurrent disease. However, significant physical and sexual impairment mostly due to anatomical distortion of external genitalia are a consequence of radical surgical treatment. Postoperative reconstruction after demolitive surgeries improves aesthetic and functional results, guarantees an adequate coverage of large tumors and assures safe surgical margin. The present study aimed to analyze feasibility and complication rates of fascio-cutaneous flap after excision for vulvovaginal malignancies. Methods PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched for records of validated vulvovaginal reconstructive techniques after demolitive surgery for vulvar cancer. All cohorts were rated for quality using a scoring method taking into account the design of the study, the sample size and quality of report of surgical data and complications. Results A total of 24 studies met?all eligibility criteria for this systematic review. All the studies were realized between 1996 and 2015. The overall sample size was 443 patients. Two major group of flap according to type of movement were identified: Advancement Flap ( V-Y Gluteal Fold Flap; Medial Thigh Flap ) and Transpositional Flap (Lotus Petal Flap; Gluteal Thigh Flap; Gluteal Fold Flap and Anterolateral Thigh Flap). The overall complications rates reported for advancement (26.7% among 165 patients on 11 series) and transposition flaps (22.3% among 278 patients on 13 series) were comparable. Conclusions A tailored procedure, based on patients' characteristics, size and location of the defect is still the goal of a successful reconstructive surgery. Proper planning of the surgical procedures, knowledge of the different surgical options and technical skills are required in order to obtain reliable and satisfying results. Highlights ? Postoperative reconstruction after demolitive vulvo-vaginal surgeries improves aesthetic and functional results. ? Transposition flaps is mainly used for small defect and require surgical skills for appropriate and safe vessel dissection, however it provide satisfactory aesthetic results. ? Advancement flaps is relatively simple to realize, could be adopted to cover moderate-large defects and ensures the same sensory innervation and analogous texture of resected area. ? Similar low rate of complications are associated with both Transposition and Advancement flaps.
机译:摘要背景外阴癌是全世界女性生殖道肿瘤的约5%的罕见疾病。目前的手术代表单独或有时与化学放射治疗组合,用于局部晚期肿瘤和复发性疾病。然而,由于外部生殖器的解剖学畸变是显着的身体和性损伤是激进手术治疗的结果。术后重建后消除手术后提高了审美和功能结果,保证了对大型肿瘤的充分覆盖并确保安全的手术边缘。本研究旨在分析外阴恶性肿瘤切除后的Fascio皮瓣的可行性和复杂性速率。方法采用PubMed(Medline),科学网和CINAHL的验证外阴癌症诊断外科术后的验证外阴重建技术的记录。使用评分方法考虑到研究的设计,手术数据和并发症报告的样本大小和质量的评分,所有队列被评为质量。结果共有24项研究会满足?这种系统审查的所有资格标准。所有研究均在1996年至2015年期间实现。整体样本规模为443名患者。鉴定了两种主要的皮瓣,根据运动类型的襟翼:进步皮瓣(V-Y臀部折叠瓣;中介大腿瓣)和转置瓣(莲花花瓣瓣;臀部大腿瓣;臀部折叠瓣和前侧大腿瓣)。报告的整体并发症率(11系列的165名患者中的26.7%)和转子襟翼(278名患者中的22.3%)可相当。结论根据患者的特征,缺陷的大小和位置的定制程序仍然是成功重建手术的目标。适当规划外科手术,需要了解不同的外科选择和技术技能,以获得可靠和令人满意的结果。强调 ?恶化外阴阴道外科治疗后的术后重建改善了审美和功能效果。还转子襟翼主要用于小缺陷,需要适当和安全的船舶解剖的手术技能,但它提供了令人满意的审美结果。还进步皮瓣相对简单地实现,可以采用以覆盖中等大的缺陷并确保切除的区域的相同的感官支配和类似的纹理。还类似的低并发症率与转置和前进翼片相关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号