首页> 外文期刊>BJU international >Comparison of high-dose (86.4 Gy) IMRT vs combined brachytherapy plus IMRT for intermediate-risk prostate cancer
【24h】

Comparison of high-dose (86.4 Gy) IMRT vs combined brachytherapy plus IMRT for intermediate-risk prostate cancer

机译:大剂量(86.4 Gy)IMRT与近距离放射治疗加IMRT联合治疗中危前列腺癌的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To compare tumour control and toxicity outcomes with the use of high-dose intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) alone or brachytherapy combined with IMRT (combo-RT) for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Patients and Methods Between 1997 and 2010, 870 consecutive patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated at our institution with either 86.4 Gy of IMRT alone (n = 470) or combo-RT consisting of brachytherapy combined with 50.4 Gy of IMRT (n = 400). Brachytherapy consisted of low-dose-rate permanent interstitial implantation in 260 patients and high-dose-rate temporary implantation in 140 patients. The median (range) follow-up for the entire cohort was 5.3 (1-14) years. Results For IMRT alone vs combo-RT, 7-year actuarial prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-relapse-free survival (PSA-RFS) rates were 81.4 vs 92.0% (P < 0.001), and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) rates were 93.0 vs 97.2% (P = 0.04), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that combo-RT was associated with better PSA-RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40 [95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.66], P < 0.001), and better DMFS (HR, 0.41 [0.18-0.92], P = 0.03). A higher incidence of acute genitourinary (GU) grade 2 (35.8 vs 18.9%; P < 0.01) and acute GU grade 3 (2.3 vs 0.4%; P = 0.03) toxicities occurred in the combo-RT group than in the IMRT-alone group. Most acute toxicity resolved. Late toxicity outcomes were similar between the treatment groups. The 7-year actuarial late toxicity rates for grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were 4.6 vs 4.1% (P = 0.89), for grade 3 GI toxicity 0.4 vs 1.4% (P = 0.36), for grade 2 GU toxicity 19.4 vs 21.2% (P = 0.14), and grade 3 GU toxicity 3.1 vs 1.4% (P = 0.74) for the IMRT vs the combo-RT group, respectively. Conclusions Enhanced dose escalation using combo-RT was associated with superior PSA-RFS and DMFS outcomes for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer compared with high-dose IMRT alone at a dose of 86.4 Gy. While acute GU toxicities were more prevalent in the combo-RT group, the incidence of late GI and GU toxicities was similar between the treatment groups.
机译:目的比较单独使用大剂量强度调节放射治疗(IMRT)或近距离放射治疗与IMRT(combo-RT)联合治疗中危前列腺癌患者的肿瘤控制和毒性结果。患者和方法在1997年至2010年之间,我们机构连续对870例中危前列腺癌患者进行了单独的86.4 Gy IMRT(n = 470)或联合放疗结合近距离放射治疗和50.4 Gy IMRT(n = 400)。近距离放射治疗包括260例低剂量率永久性间质植入和140例患者高剂量率临时植入。整个队列的中位(范围)随访时间为5.3(1-14)年。结果对于单独的IMRT与组合式RT,7年精算前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)无复发生存率(PSA-RFS)分别为81.4对92.0%(P <0.001)和远处无转移生存率(DMFS) )的比例分别为93.0%和97.2%(P = 0.04)。多变量分析显示,组合RT与更好的PSA-RFS相关(危险比[HR],0.40 [95%置信区间,0.24-0.66],P <0.001)和更好的DMFS(HR,0.41 [0.18-0.92]) ,P = 0.03)。与单独使用IMRT相比,combo-RT组的急性泌尿生殖系统(GU)2级发生率(35.8 vs 18.9%; P <0.01)和GU 3级急性发生率(2.3 vs 0.4%; P = 0.03)高。组。大部分急性毒性消失。治疗组之间的后期毒性结果相似。 2级胃肠道(GI)毒性的7年精算后期毒性率为4.6 vs 4.1%(P = 0.89),3级GI毒性为0.4 vs 1.4%(P = 0.36),2 GU毒性为19.4 vs 21.2 IMRT组与combo-RT组相比,%(P = 0.14)和3级GU毒性分别为3.1%和1.4%(P = 0.74)。结论与单独使用大剂量IMRT的86.4 Gy剂量相比,使用combo-RT增强的剂量递增与中危前列腺癌患者具有更好的PSA-RFS和DMFS结果相关。虽然combo-RT组的急性GU毒性更为普遍,但治疗组之间的晚期GI和GU毒性发生率相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号