首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture and Human Values >Rights-based food systems and the goals of food systems reform
【24h】

Rights-based food systems and the goals of food systems reform

机译:基于权利的粮食系统与粮食系统改革的目标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Food security, health, decent livelihoods, gender equity, safe working conditions, cultural identity and participation in cultural life are basic human rights that can be achieved at least in part through the food system. But current trends in the US prevent full realization of these economic, social, and cultural rights (ESCR) for residents, farmers, and wageworkers in the food system. Supply chains that strive to meet the goals of social justice, economic equity, and environmental quality better than the dominant globalized food value networks are gaining popularity in the US. However, achieving important human rights has become conflated with other goals of food system reform over the past decade, such as being community-based, local, and sustainable. This conflation confuses means, ends, and complementary goals; and it may lead activists trying to help communities to regain control of their food system choices into less productive strategies. This paper introduces a new concept, rights-based food systems (RBFS), and explores its connection with localization and sustainability. The core criteria of RBFS are democratic participation in food system choices affecting more than one sector; fair, transparent access by producers to all necessary resources for food production and marketing; multiple independent buyers; absence of human exploitation; absence of resource exploitation; and no impingement on the ability of people in other locales to meet this set of criteria. Localization and a community base can help achieve RBFS by facilitating food democracy and reducing environmental exploitation, primarily by lowering environmental costs due to long-distance transportation. Sustainability per se is an empty goal for food system reform, unless what will be sustained and for whom are specified. The RBFS concept helps to clarify what is worth sustaining and who is most susceptible to neglect in attempts to reform food systems. Localization can be a means toward sustainability if local food systems are also RBFS.
机译:粮食安全,健康,体面的生计,性别平等,安全的工作条件,文化认同和参与文化生活是基本人权,可以至少部分通过粮食系统实现。但是,美国当前的趋势阻碍了食品系统中居民,农民和工资工人充分实现这些经济,社会和文化权利(ESCR)。在美国,与主流的全球化食品价值网络相比,力求更好地实现社会公正,经济公平和环境质量目标的供应链正在日益普及。但是,在过去十年中,实现重要人权已与食品体系改革的其他目标(例如基于社区,地方性和可持续性)混为一谈。这种混合混淆了手段,目的和补充目标。这可能会导致激进主义者试图帮助社区将对食物系统选择​​的控制权重新转化为生产力较低的策略。本文介绍了一种新的概念,即基于权利的粮食系统(RBFS),并探讨了其与本地化和可持续性的联系。 RBFS的核心标准是民主参与影响多个部门的粮食系统选择;生产者公平,透明地获得用于粮食生产和销售的所有必要资源;多个独立买家;缺乏对人类的剥削;缺乏资源开发;不会影响其他地区的人们满足这套标准的能力。本地化和社区基础可以通过促进食品民主和减少环境剥削(主要是通过降低长途运输的环境成本)来帮助实现RBFS。可持续性本身对于粮食体系改革是一个空洞的目标,除非可持续性是什么,并为谁指定。 RBFS概念有助于弄清什么是值得维持的,哪些人最容易在尝试改革食品系统时被忽视。如果当地食品系统也是RBFS,则本地化可以成为实现可持续发展的一种手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号