首页> 外文期刊>South African medical journal: Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde >'Covering doctors' standing in for unavailable colleagues: What is the legal position?
【24h】

'Covering doctors' standing in for unavailable colleagues: What is the legal position?

机译:'涵盖医生'站在不可用的同事:法律地位是什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Covering doctors are those who stand in for colleagues when the latter are unable to deal with their patients. Covering doctors who begin to issue telephonic instructions to nurses or other healthcare practitioners regarding the treatment of the patients they are covering are in the same position as any other doctors treating patients. They cannot argue that the patients they are covering only become their patients once an emergency or crisis occurs or when they see the patients for the first time, and that prior to that their function is merely to monitor the patient's progress. They also cannot rely on telephone instructions for long periods of time when the patient's health may be in danger, without seeing the patient. However, if covering doctors are found to be negligent they can still escape liability if the plaintiff cannot prove a causal link between their negligence and the harm that resulted 'beyond a reasonable doubt'.
机译:当后者无法处理他们的患者时,覆盖医生就是那些代表同事的人。 涵盖开始向护士或其他医疗保健从业人员提供有关他们所覆盖的患者的其他医疗保健从业者的医生与治疗患者的任何其他医生在同一位置。 他们不能争辩说,他们覆盖的患者只会成为他们的患者,一旦发生紧急情况或危机,或者他们第一次看到患者,并且在其功能之前只能监测患者的进展。 当患者的健康状况可能存在危险时,他们也不能长时间依赖电话指示,而不会看到病人。 但是,如果发现覆盖医生疏忽,如果原告不能证明他们的疏忽与造成“超出合理怀疑”的伤害之间的因果关系,他们仍然可以逃避责任。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号