...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Science >Climate Control, a Costly Exercise in Futility
【24h】

Climate Control, a Costly Exercise in Futility

机译:气候控制,徒劳无益的代价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

I agree with Mr Mike Stephen's article (July 2009) that more discussion and debate should be encouraged on the issue of climate change and the Government's intended policy on how to reduce CO_2 emissions, eventually to be legislated. Though the sceptics are in the minority they would not be able to change the Government's strong belief that CO_2 is a satanic gas. Even so, for this debate to have any meaning, it is important to include the view of the sceptics. In fact, their numbers are more extensive than is generally realised. We have had recorded cold and warm periods since ancient times, like pre-Minoan and Roman. Equally, low and high levels of CO_2 were determined by ice cores and other means. All these were normal global events. Why are we now confronted with the findings that the increase in C02 is considered harmful?
机译:我同意麦克·史蒂芬先生的文章(2009年7月),应鼓励就气候变化问题以及政府打算如何减少CO_2排放的政策进行更多的讨论和辩论,最终将通过立法。尽管持怀疑态度的人占少数,但他们无法改变政府坚信CO_2是一种撒旦气体。即使如此,为了使这场辩论具有任何意义,重要的是要包括怀疑者的观点。实际上,它们的数量比通常实现的数量更多。自从远古以来,我们就已经记录了寒冷和温暖的时期,如米诺斯时代以前和罗马时代。同样,通过冰芯和其他方式确定了低水平和高水平的CO_2。所有这些都是正常的全球性事件。为什么我们现在面对这样的发现,即认为增加CO2有害?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号