...
首页> 外文期刊>Soil & Tillage Research >Soil loss due to root crop harvesting increases with tillage operations
【24h】

Soil loss due to root crop harvesting increases with tillage operations

机译:根部作物收获因耕作作业而导致的土壤损失

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Variations in soil conditions and root crop parameters have significant impact on soil loss due to root crop harvesting (SLCH). Tillage operation may alter soil properties and root crop performance and consequently influence SLCH. The objective of this study was to determine the best tillage practice that can reduce SLCH with optimum crop yield and to understand the mechanism of tillage practices on SLCH. A 3-year field investigations were conducted with four different tillage practices: no-till (NT), traditional tillage (TT), minimum tillage (MT) and conventional tillage (CT), planted with two yarn cultivars. Annual SLCH increased with increases in tillage operations. Mean annual SLCH value was highest under mechanized tillage (CT and MT) (346.29 kg ha(-1) harvest(-1) yr(-1)), followed by TT (106.50 kg ha(-1) harvest(-1) yr(-1)) and least by NT (50.27 kg ha(-1) harvest(-1) yr(-1)). Also, MT significantly (p & 0.05) reduced SLCH compared to CT by 39.4%. Root hair density and root crop yields increased but soil bulk density decreased with tillage operations. SLCH was significantly linearly related to root hair density (r(2) = 0.85-0.93; p & 0.01) and root crop yields (r(2) = 0.59-0.81; p & 0.01), and inversely related to soil bulk density (r(2) = -0.45 - -0.65; p & 0.05) for all tillage management practices investigated. Tillage impacts SLCH by two mechanisms: one is direct impact on SLCH by enhancing root hairs and root crop yields, and another is indirect impact on SLCH by reducing soil bulk density to create good soil conditions for root growth and development. Mechanized tillage had highest root crop yield (11.12 t ha(-1)), followed by TT' (6.08 t ha(-1)) and least by NT (3.43 t ha(-1)). However, root crop yields from both CT (11.26 t ha(-1)) and MT (10.97 t ha(-1)) were not significantly different. Our study suggests that minimum tillage system of farming could be a viable alternative for a large scale farming to obtain optimum root crop yields as well as mitigating SLCH.
机译:土壤条件和根部作物参数的变化对由于根系庄稼收获而对土壤损失产生重大影响(SLCH)。耕作操作可以改变土壤性质和根作作物性能,从而影响血清。本研究的目的是确定最佳的耕作实践,可以减少具有最佳作物产量的血清,并了解耕地的耕作实践机制。采用四种不同的耕作实践进行了3年的现场调查:用两种纱线种植的耕作(NT),传统耕作(TT),最低耕作(MT)和常规耕作(CT)。每年的Slch增加耕作行动的增加。根据机械化耕种(CT和MT)的平均年平板值最高(346.29 kg(-1)收获(-1)Yr(-1)),其次是TT(106.50 kg ha(-1)收获(-1) Yr(-1))和最小NT(50.27kg ha(-1)收获(-1)Yr(-1))。此外,与CT相比,MT显着(P& 0.05)减少39.4%。根毛密度和根部作物产量增加,但土壤堆积密度随耕作作用而降低。与根毛密度显着线性地线性相关(R(2)= 0.85-0.93; p& 0.01)和根部作物产量(r(2)= 0.59-0.81; p& 0.01),以及成反比与土壤堆积密度有关(R(2)= -0.45 - -0.65; P& LT; 0.05)进行调查所有耕作管理。通过两种机制,耕作撞击力:通过增强根毛和根部作物产量,对SLCH直接影响,另一个是通过减少土壤堆积密度对SLCH的间接影响,以产生良好的根系生长和发育的良好土壤条件。机械化耕种具有最高的根作物产量(11.12 t ha(-1)),其次是tt'(6.08 t ha(-1)),最小nt(3.43 t ha(-1))。然而,来自CT(11.26 t ha(-1))和mt(10.97 t ha(-1))的根作作物产量没有显着差异。我们的研究表明,最低耕作系统可能是大规模农业的可行替代品,以获得最佳的根作作物产量以及缓解锤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号