首页> 外文期刊>Sexually transmitted diseases >Emergency Department Testing Patterns for Sexually Transmitted Diseases in North Texas
【24h】

Emergency Department Testing Patterns for Sexually Transmitted Diseases in North Texas

机译:南德克萨斯州北德克萨斯州性传播疾病的急诊科检测模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Little is known about population-level sexually transmitted disease (STD) testing in emergency departments (EDs). We sought to explore STD testing patterns in EDs in a large, urban metroplex in North Texas, a high prevalence region. Methods Emergency department claims data were extracted from the Dallas Fort Worth Hospital Council databank for patients attending 54 EDs in 4 counties (Dallas, Tarrant, Collin, and Denton) who were tested for an STD during an ED visit between July 2014 and June 2015. We analyzed patterns of testing for 3 types of STD tests: (1) combined gonorrhea and chlamydia DNA-based tests, (2) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody tests, and (3) syphilis serological tests. Results Emergency departments administered at least 1 STD test to 65,702 unique patients over 1 year; most were ethnoracial minorities (73%), female (72%), and had no known insurance (59%). Only 8% of patients received more than 1 of these tests at that same visit; of those, 90% were cotested for HIV. The most common diagnosis code associated with STD testing was "genital/urinary symptoms" (31%). The majority of tests took place at the ED of a single county-funded hospital (42%). Only 36% of all patients had visits that were deemed true emergencies. Conclusions Most patients tested for syphilis, HIV, or chlamydia/gonorrhea in EDs received only 1 test type at that visit, and most visits were nonemergent in nature. Given shared risk factors for multiple STD and high coinfection rates, EDs serving high-risk populations could consider STD cotesting to help reduce transmission of undiagnosed, untreated infections.
机译:背景技术对于急诊部门(EDS)中的人口水平性传播疾病(STD)测试很少。我们试图在北德克萨斯州北德克萨斯州北德克萨斯州的大型城市大都市的eds中探索STD测试模式。方法采用达拉斯沃思堡医院议会数据库提取急救署索赔数据,用于在2014年7月至2015年7月至2015年6月期间进行STD测试的4个县(Dallas,Tarrant,Collin和Denton)的患者。我们分析了3种类型的STD测试的测试模式:(1)组合淋病和基于衣原体的基于DNA的试验,(2)人免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)抗体试验,以及(3)梅毒血清学试验。结果应急部门在1年内给65,702名独特的患者进行了至少1个STD测试;大多数是民族少数群体(73%),女性(72%),没有已知的保险(59%)。只有8%的患者在同一访问中获得了超过1种测试;其中,90%的艾滋病毒艾滋病病毒症是Cotested。与STD测试相关的最常见的诊断代码是“生殖器/尿症状”(31%)。大部分测试在一个县级资助医院的ED(42%)。只有36%的患者曾认为是真正的紧急情况的访问。结论,对于梅毒,艾滋病毒艾滋病毒或衣原体/淋病的大多数患者在该访问中仅收到了1种测试类型,并且大多数访问都是非本质的。给定多个STD和高辛射率的共享风险因素,服务高风险群体的EDS可以考虑STD Cotesting,以帮助减少未确诊,未经处理的感染的传播。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号