首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Economics >Willingness to pay for brands: a cross-region, cross-category analysis.
【24h】

Willingness to pay for brands: a cross-region, cross-category analysis.

机译:品牌支付意愿:跨区域,跨类别的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Using survey data collected in multiple locations (California and Texas in the United States and Revohot in Israel), we quantify category- and location-specific variations of consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for brand products after controlling for consumer characteristics. We find that consumers have a similar qualitative assessment of brand value in different product categories across different locations. That is, consumers have a stronger preference and higher WTP for brands in consumer electronics, followed by clothing and then processed food, and the lowest in fresh produce. Furthermore, we simulate price premiums and market shares of brands relative to generic products in different categories. Simulation results suggest that brands in fresh produce have the highest price premium but lowest market share. Despite the similarities, the magnitude of WTP for brands as well as the simulated price premium and the corresponding market share in the same product category are location variant. The similarities and dissimilarities suggest validity of having global brand strategies adapted to local conditions, that is, the so-called "thinking globally and acting locally" strategy.
机译:使用在多个地点(美国的加利福尼亚和德克萨斯州以及以色列的Revohot)收集的调查数据,我们在控制了消费者特征之后,量化了消费者对品牌产品支付意愿(WTP)的类别和位置特定差异。我们发现,消费者在不同地点对不同产品类别的品牌价值进行了类似的定性评估。也就是说,消费者对消费电子产品中的品牌拥有更强的偏好和更高的WTP,其次是服装,然后是加工食品,而新鲜农产品中的最低。此外,我们模拟了品牌相对于不同类别的仿制药的价格溢价和市场份额。模拟结果表明,新鲜农产品中的品牌价格溢价最高,但市场份额最低。尽管有相似之处,但品牌的WTP量以及模拟的价格溢价和同一产品类别中的相应市场份额是不同的。相似之处和不同之处表明,使全球品牌战略适应当地情况是正确的,即所谓的“全球思考和本地行动”战略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号