首页> 外文期刊>Simulation modelling practice and theory: International journal of the Federation of European Simulation Societies >Development and evaluation of a Basestock-CONWIP pull production control strategy in balanced assembly systems
【24h】

Development and evaluation of a Basestock-CONWIP pull production control strategy in balanced assembly systems

机译:平衡装配系统中基础 - 康维普拉生产控制策略的开发与评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study, a new pull production control strategy called Basestock-Constant Work-in-Process (B-CONWIP) is proposed. It is used to control the flow of materials and information in balanced assembly production systems. This proposed control strategy uses one type of authorization cards called CONWIP card that limits the work-in-process (WIP) in the whole system. It has been applied in a single-product and a mixed-product assembly system balanced by two efficient Genetic algorithms introduced in literature. The performance of this control strategy is compared with another pull production control strategy called Bases-tock Kanban CONWIP (BK-CONWIP), which is a very promising production control strategy found in literature. The proposed strategy has two control parameters, CONWIP authorization cards and basestock levels while BK-CONWIP has three control parameters Kanban authorization cards, CONWIP authorization cards and basestock levels. The comparison is based on three performance measures average system WIP, percentage of satisfied customer demand (service level) and WIP variation between workstations. The performance of the proposed strategy B-CONWIP and BK-CONWIP is mainly similar in both types of assembly systems when mean demand rates are low with respect to mean service rates with the proposed strategy being easier to control and optimize. On the other hand, when mean demand rates are high with respect to mean service rates; B-CONWIP is preferable if service level is more important, while BK-CONWIP is preferable if WIP level is more important. Regarding WIP variation, it mainly depends on the efficiency of the balancing approach. The more efficient the balancing approach, the less WIP variation. Treating demand as lost instead of backordered results in decreased average system WIP and does not affect service levels in both PCSs. It is also shown that S-KDP is more flexible in dealing with situations of variable product mixes than D-KDP because control parameters can be used by any product which minimizes the effect of the unbalanced systems. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在本研究中,提出了一种称为基础 - 恒定的工艺(B-CONWIP)的新的拉制剂控制策略。它用于控制平衡组装生产系统中的材料流程和信息。该提出的控制策略使用一种称为Conwip卡的一种类型的授权卡,这些卡限制了整个系统中的过程(WIP)。它已被应用于单产品和通过文献中引入的两个有效的遗传算法平衡的混合产品组装系统。将该控制策略的性能与另一个称为Bases-Tock Kanban Conwip(BK-Conwip)的拉动生产控制策略进行比较,这是一个在文献中发现的非常有前景的生产控制策略。拟议的策略有两个控制参数,Conwip授权卡和基础级别,而BK-Conwip有三个控制参数Kanban授权卡,Conwip授权卡和基础水平。比较基于三个性能测量平均系统WIP,满足客户需求(服务水平)的百分比和工作站之间的WIP变化。拟议的策略B-CONWIP和BK-CONWIP的性能主要在两种类型的装配系统中相似,当平均需求率与均拟策略更容易控制和优化的平均服务率。另一方面,当平均需求相对于平均服务速率很高时;如果服务水平更为重要,则优选B-Conwip,而BK-Conwip是优选的,如果WIP水平更为重要。关于WIP变异,它主要取决于平衡方法的效率。均衡的平衡方法越高,WIP变化越少。将需求视为丢失而不是延期交货的结果,降低平均系统WIP,不会影响两个PC的服务水平。还表明,在处理比D-KDP的情况下,S-KDP更灵活,因为可以通过最小化不平衡系统的效果的任何产品使用控制参数。 (c)2018 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号