首页> 外文期刊>Seminars in hearing >Effectiveness of Auditory Measures for Detecting Hidden Hearing Loss and/or Cochlear Synaptopathy: A Systematic Review
【24h】

Effectiveness of Auditory Measures for Detecting Hidden Hearing Loss and/or Cochlear Synaptopathy: A Systematic Review

机译:检测隐性听力损失和/或耳蜗突触疗法检测听觉措施的有效性:系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Standard audiometric evaluations are not sensitive enough to identify hidden hearing loss (HHL) and/or cochlear synaptopathy (CS). Patients with either of these conditions frequently present with difficulty understanding speech in noise or other complaints such as tinnitus. The purpose of this systematic review is to identify articles in peer-reviewed journals that assessed the sensitivity of audiologic measures for detecting HHL and/or CS, and which showed potential for use in a clinical test battery for these disorders. A reference librarian submitted specific boolean terminology to MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. The authors used a consensus approach with specially designed score sheets for the selection of titles, abstracts, and then articles for inclusion in the systematic review and for quality assessment. Fifteen articles were included in the systematic review. Seven articles involved humans; seven involved animals, and one study used both humans and animals. Results showed that pure-tone audiometry to 20 kHz, otoacoustic emissions, electrocochleography, auditory brain-stem response (ABR), electrophysiological tests, speech recognition in noise with and without temporal distortion, interviews, and self-report measures have been used to assess HHL and/or CS. For HHL, ultra-high-frequency audiometry may help identify persons with sensory hair cell loss that does not show up on standard audiograms. Promising nonbehavioral measures for CS included ABR wave I amplitude, the summating potential-to-action potential ratio, and speech recognition in noise with and without temporal distortion. Self-report question-naires also may help identify auditory dysfunction in persons with normal hearing.
机译:标准听力测量评估不足以识别隐性听力损失(HHL)和/或耳蜗突触疗法(CS)。这些条件中的任何一个经常存在的患者难以解决噪音或其他诱惑等耳鸣的言论。该系统审查的目的是识别同伴审查期刊的文章,这些期刊中评估了检测HHL和/或CS的听力学措施的敏感性,并且显示出用于这些疾病的临床测试电池的可能性。参考图书管理员向Medline,Embase和Scient Web提交了特定的布尔术语。作者使用了一种共识方法,具有专门设计的评分表,用于选择标题,摘要,然后是包含在系统审查和质量评估中的文章。十五篇文章被列入系统审查。七篇文章涉及人类;七只涉及动物,一项研究用来了人类和动物。结果表明,纯音听力为20 kHz,耳声排放,电胶层,听觉脑干响应(ABR),电生理试验,噪音中的语音识别,且没有时间扭曲,访谈和自我报告措施已经用于评估HHL和/或CS。对于HHL,超高频听力测量仪可能有助于识别具有在标准听力图上没有出现的感觉毛细胞损失的人。对CS的非弯曲措施包括ABR Wave I幅度,总结电位潜在比率,以及具有和没有时间失真的噪声中的语音识别。自我报告的问题 - 纳伯士也可能有助于识别正常听证的人的听觉功能障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号