...
首页> 外文期刊>Seizure: the journal of the British Epilepsy Association >Engaging psychiatrists in the diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. What can they contribute?
【24h】

Engaging psychiatrists in the diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. What can they contribute?

机译:在诊断心理注意力癫痫发作的诊断中,从事精神科医生。 他们能贡献什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Highlights ? Psychiatrists as a group disagree and fail frequently in diagnosing PNES. ? As individuals, psychiatrists compared with neurologists for correct diagnoses. ? To justify the diagnoses, attention is paid by psychiatrists on body movements. ? Psychiatrists are attuned to human behaviour and subjective experiences. ? Psychiatrists can contribute a new lexicon in defining PNES. Abstract Purpose To investigate if psychiatrists could predict the diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) by reviewing videos of seizures of various types and to compare the accuracy and the criteria leading to the diagnosis used by psychiatrists with those used by epileptologists. Methods Four board-certified psychiatrists were asked to review 23 videos capturing representative events of 21 unselected consecutive patients admitted to an epilepsy center for long-term video-EEG monitoring. All raters were blind to EEG and clinical information. They were requested to (1) rate the videos for quality and content; (2) choose among four diagnoses: (a) epileptic seizures; (b) PNES; (c) Other nonepileptic seizures (syncope, movement disorder, migraine, etc.); (d) “Cannot Say”; and (3) explain in their own words the main reasons leading to the diagnosis of choice. The results were compared to those of four blind epileptologists who independently reviewed the same cases. The inter-rater reliability was tested with the Kappa statistic. Results All psychiatrists were concordant and correct in 3/23 video-events, compared to 8/23 among epileptologists. Despite widespread disagreement among themselves and frequent failures as a group, individual psychiatrists scored a comparable number of correct diagnoses as did individual epileptologists. The comments provided to justify the diagnosis of choice differed from neurologists, varied among raters, and reflected considerable attention to body movements and body language. Conclusion Psychiatrists, as a group, are less reliable than neurologists in differentiating seizure types on video but, as individuals, can be quite accurate in making the correct diagnosis because they are more attuned to capture the subtleties of human behaviour, of subjective experiences, as the effects of hidden internal conflicts and can contribute a new lexicon in defining PNES.
机译:强调 ?精神科医生作为群体不同意,经常在诊断PNES时失败。还作为个体,精神科医生与神经科学家相比正确诊断。还为了证明诊断,精神科医生对身体运动的关注。还精神科医生对人类的行为和主观体验。还精神科医生可以在定义PNES中贡献新的词典。摘要目的是通过审查各种类型的癫痫发作视频和比较精神科医生使用的精度和标准来预测精神病学癫痫发作(PNIS)的诊断,以比较精度和标准。方法有四个董事会认证的精神科医生审查23个视频捕获21名未选择的连续患者的代表事件,该患者录取癫痫中心长期视频EEG监测。所有评价者都对脑电图和临床信息视而不见。他们被要求(1)对视频进行质量和内容的评分; (2)选择四个诊断:(a)癫痫发作; (b)潘恩斯; (c)其他非分泌的癫痫发作(晕厥,运动障碍,偏头痛等); (d)“不能说”; (3)以自己的话语解释主要原因,导致选择诊断。将结果与四名盲目癫痫药剂的结果进行了比较,他们独立审查了同样的病例。利用Kappa统计测试了帧间间可靠性。结果所有精神科医生在3/23视频活动中都很合作,并纠正,而脱渗菌家中的8/23则为8/23。尽管他们自己和频繁的失败普遍普遍存在,但个人精神科医生可以获得可比较的正确诊断,就像单独的脱骨科医生一样。提供的评论是为了证明所选择的诊断与神经根学家不同,在评级中不同,并反映了对身体运动和肢体语言的相当关注。结论作为一个群体的精神科医生不如神经科学家在视频上区分癫痫发作类型,但作为个体,可以相当准确地制作正确的诊断,因为它们更加努力捕获人类行为的细节,主观经历隐藏内部冲突的影响,并可以在定义PNES中贡献新的词典。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号