首页> 外文期刊>Seizure: the journal of the British Epilepsy Association >Self-Report questionnaires for the diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures in clinical practice. A comprehensive review of the available instruments
【24h】

Self-Report questionnaires for the diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures in clinical practice. A comprehensive review of the available instruments

机译:自我报告问卷诊断临床实践中的心理非癫痫发作。 全面审查可用文书

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We searched Medline from 1946 to 2019 for reports exploring differences between PNES and other comparable paroxysmal events using clinical instruments, few of which focused on the differential diagnosis using broad-based questionnaires covering multiple aspects of this condition. The majority investigated single items to highlight specific differences, either qualitative or quantitative, between groups and to elucidate some of the pathogenetic mechanisms of PNES. We selected all variables that proved to be useful for differentiating PNES from other types of paroxysmal events and classified them by category, by instrument utilized and method of investigation. This body of data will constitute the basis for assembling a new set of evidence-based questionnaires for patients and eyewitnesses to facilitate the differential diagnosis of these disorders, especially in resource-poor clinical settings. This will require a skillful translation of the content of each selected variable into clear and intuitive questions, appropriate for lay responders. Predictive variables found by more than one investigator, especially if using different approaches, have greater diagnostic weight and should be prominent in future questionnaires. However, even variables so far found to be predictive by one investigator will deserve consideration. Once the preliminary text of the questionnaires is consolidated, the instrument will need extensive testing and validation in large prospective studies before becoming available for clinical use in its definitive format.
机译:我们从1946年到2019年搜索了Medline,报道了使用临床仪器探讨了PNES和其他可比较的阵发性事件之间的差异,其中很少有专注于使用涵盖这种情况的多个方面的广泛问卷的差异诊断。大多数人调查了单一物品以突出特定差异,有些定性或定量,在群体之间以及阐明PNES的一些致病机制。我们选择了所有的变量,证明是有用的用于区分PNES与其他类型的阵发性事件,按类别分类,通过仪器分类和调查方法。该数据体将构成为患者和目击者组装新的循证问卷的基础,以促进这些疾病的鉴别诊断,特别是在资源缺乏临床环境中。这将需要熟练地将每个选定变量的内容翻译成明确和直观的问题,适合于响应者。由多个研究人员发现的预测变量,特别是如果使用不同的方法,具有更大的诊断重量,并且在未来的问卷中应该突出。但是,到目前为止发现一个调查员预测的变量也值得考虑。一旦综合问卷的初稿,该仪器将在大型前瞻性研究中需要大量的测试和验证,然后才能以最明确的格式可供临床使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号