...
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. >Seated limits‐of‐stability of athletes with disabilities with regard to competitive levels and sport classification
【24h】

Seated limits‐of‐stability of athletes with disabilities with regard to competitive levels and sport classification

机译:关于竞争水平和体育分类的竞技人员的运动员稳定性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this study, we asked whether wheelchair rugby ( WR ) classification and competitive level influence trunk function of athletes with disabilities, in terms of seated limits‐of‐stability (LoS). Twenty‐eight athletes were recruited from international‐ and national‐level WR teams, with each group exhibiting marked differences in years of sports practice and training volume. Athletes were also distributed into three groups according their classification: low‐point (0.5‐1.5‐point); mid‐point (2.0‐2.5‐point); and high‐point (3.0‐3.5‐point). Athletes were asked to sit on a force platform and to lean the body as far as possible in eight predefined directions. Center of pressure ( COP ) coordinates were calculated from the ground reaction forces acquired with the force platform. LoS were computed as the area of ellipse adjusted to maximal COP excursion achieved for the eight directions. ANOVA s reveal that LoS were not different when international‐ and national‐level players were compared ( P =.744). Nevertheless, LoS were larger in players from the high‐point group than from the low‐point group ( P =.028), with the mid‐point group being not different from both ( P .194). In summary, (i) competitive level does not impact LoS measures and (ii) LoS are remarkably distinct when comparing both extremes of the WR classification range. Our results suggest that, as a training‐resistant measure, LoS could be a valid assessment of trunk impairment, potentially contributing to the development of an evidence‐based WR classification.
机译:在这项研究中,我们询问轮椅橄榄球(WR)分类和竞争程度是否影响了运动员残疾的运动员,就坐姿稳定(LOS)。来自国际和国家级别的WR队招募了二十八名运动员,每组展示多年体育惯例和培训量的明显差异。运动员还根据分类分配为三组:低点(0.5-1.5点);中点(2.0-2.5点);和高点(3.0-3.5点)。要求运动员坐在力平台上,并尽可能在八个预定义方向上倾斜身体。压力中心(COP)坐标由用力平台获得的地面反作用力计算。根据八个方向实现的椭圆区域调整为最大支付的椭圆区域。 ANOVA S显示在比较国际和国家级别的球员时洛杉矶没有什么不同(P = .744)。然而,从高点组的球员比低点组(p = .028)的球员更大,中间点组与两者不同(p& .194)不同。总之,(i)竞争水平不会影响LOS措施,(ii)在比较WR分类范围的极端性极端时,LOS非常明显。我们的研究结果表明,作为抗性衡量标准,LOS可能是对中继减值的有效评估,可能导致发展证据的WR分类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号