首页> 外文期刊>School Mental Health >Multiple Stakeholder Perspectives on School-Based Responses to Student Suicide Risk in a Diverse Public School District
【24h】

Multiple Stakeholder Perspectives on School-Based Responses to Student Suicide Risk in a Diverse Public School District

机译:多种利益攸关方对学校对学生自杀风险的基于学校的响应的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Schools across the US have implemented suicide prevention procedures to detect risk among students and facilitate linkage to mental health services. Yet, many students at risk for suicide do not access mental health treatment, and significant racial/ethnic disparities in service utilization persist. Quality improvement of suicide prevention procedures is needed to enhance care for suicidal youth. The present study examined perspectives of multiple stakeholders involved in school-based suicide prevention procedures through a qualitative design, in order to generate a set of quality improvement targets. Participants included school staff, students assessed for suicide risk at school, and their caregivers. Results indicated points of commonality and divergence across stakeholder groups. Students and parents described feelings of exclusion from decision-making processes, perceptions of rigid and disciplinary assessment procedures, traumatic experiences with crisis intervention, and practical barriers and facilitators to follow-up services. Staff perspectives highlighted positive regard for standardized protocols, efforts to reduce negative student experiences with assessment procedures, prioritization of student safety, and potential practical and attitudinal barriers and facilitators to follow-up care. Given these findings, a set of quality improvement targets is proposed and discussed, with a focus on family-centered interventions to promote engagement.
机译:美国各地的学校已经实施了自杀预防程序,以检测学生的风险,并促进与心理健康服务的联系。然而,许多自杀风险的学生不接受心理健康处理,并且服务利用率的重要种族/民族差异持续存在。需要提高自杀预防程序,以提高自杀青年的护理。本研究通过定性设计检查了多个利益相关者参与校本自杀预防程序的观点,以产生一系列质量改进目标。参与者包括学校工作人员,学生在学校的自杀风险以及他们的照顾者评估。结果表明利益相关者群体的共性和分歧点。学生和父母描述了从决策过程中排斥的感觉,对刚性和纪律评估程序的看法,危机干预的创伤经历,以及对后续服务的实际障碍和促进者。员工视角突出了标准化议定书的积极考虑,努力减少否定学生经验,评估程序,学生安全的优先级,以及潜在的实用和态度障碍和促进者进行随访。鉴于这些发现,提出并讨论了一套质量改善目标,重点关注家庭中心的干预措施来促进参与。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号