...
首页> 外文期刊>Science and engineering ethics >Plagiarism, Cheating and Research Integrity: Case Studies from a Masters Program in Peru
【24h】

Plagiarism, Cheating and Research Integrity: Case Studies from a Masters Program in Peru

机译:抄袭,作弊与研究诚信:秘鲁大师计划的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Plagiarism is a serious, yet widespread type of research misconduct, and is often neglected in developing countries. Despite its far-reaching implications, plagiarism is poorly acknowledged and discussed in the academic setting, and insufficient evidence exists in Latin America and developing countries to inform the development of preventive strategies. In this context, we present a longitudinal case study of seven instances of plagiarism and cheating arising in four consecutive classes (2011-2014) of an Epidemiology Masters program in Lima, Peru, and describes the implementation and outcomes of a multifaceted, "zero-tolerance" policy aimed at introducing research integrity. Two cases involved cheating in graded assignments, and five cases correspond to plagiarism in the thesis protocol. Cases revealed poor awareness of high tolerance to plagiarism, poor academic performance, and widespread writing deficiencies, compensated with patchwriting and copy-pasting. Depending on the events' severity, penalties included course failure (6/7) and separation from the program (3/7). Students at fault did not engage in further plagiarism. Between 2011 and 2013, the Masters program sequentially introduced a preventive policy consisting of: (i) intensified research integrity and scientific writing education, (ii) a stepwise, cumulative writing process; (iii) honor codes; (iv) active search for plagiarism in all academic products; and (v) a "zero-tolerance" policy in response to documented cases. No cases were detected in 2014. In conclusion, plagiarism seems to be widespread in resource-limited settings and a greater response with educational and zero-tolerance components is needed to prevent it.
机译:抄袭是一个严重但广泛的研究不当行为,在发展中国家往往被忽视。尽管其影响深远,但在学术环境中持证和讨论了抄袭,并在拉丁美洲和发展中国家存在的证据不足,以提供预防策略的发展。在这种情况下,我们在利马,秘鲁的流行病学大师计划的四个连续课程(2011-2014)中出现了纵向案例研究,并在利马,秘鲁的流行病学大师计划中出现了一系列的秘书大学(2011-2014),并描述了多方面的实施和结果“零”宽容“旨在引入研究完整性的政策。两种案例涉及分配作业的作弊,五种情况与论文议定书中的抄袭。案件揭示了对抄袭,学术表现差和广泛写作缺陷的高耐受性差的认识,补偿了包装和复印粘贴。根据事件的严重程度,处罚包括课程失败(6/7)并与计划(3/7)分离。故障的学生没有参与进一步的抄袭。 2011年至2013年间,硕士计划顺序地推出了一种预防性政策,包括:(i)加强研究诚信和科学写作教育,(ii)逐步累积写作过程; (iii)荣誉法典; (iv)主动搜索所有学术产品的抄袭; (v)响应记录案件的“零容忍”政策。在2014年没有检测到任何病例。总之,抄袭似乎普遍存在资源限制的环境中,并且需要更大的教育和零容忍组分来防止它。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号