...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural and Forest Meteorology >How should we model plant responses to drought? An analysis of stomatal and non-stomatal responses to water stress.
【24h】

How should we model plant responses to drought? An analysis of stomatal and non-stomatal responses to water stress.

机译:我们应该如何模拟植物对干旱的反应?对水分胁迫的气孔和非气孔反应的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Models disagree on how to represent effects of drought stress on plant gas exchange. Some models assume drought stress affects the marginal water use efficiency of plants (marginal WUE= delta A/ delta E; i.e. the change in photosynthesis per unit of change in transpiration) whereas others assume drought stress acts directly on photosynthetic capacity. We investigated drought stress in an analysis of results from 22 experimental data sets where photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and predawn leaf water potential were measured at increasing levels of water stress. Our analysis was framed by a recently developed stomatal model that reconciles the empirical and optimal approaches to predicting stomatal conductance. The model has single parameter g1, a decreasing function of marginal WUE. Species differed greatly in their estimated g1 values under moist conditions, and in the rate at which g1 declined with water stress. In some species, particularly the sclerophyll trees, g1 remained nearly constant or even increased. Photosynthesis was found almost universally to decrease more than could be explained by the reduction in g1, implying a decline in apparent carboxylation capacity (Vcmax). Species differed in the predawn water potential at which apparent Vcmax declined most steeply, and in the steepness of this decline. Principal components analysis revealed a gradient in water relation strategies from trees to herbs. Herbs had higher apparent Vcmax under moist conditions but trees tended to maintain more open stomata and higher apparent Vcmax under dry conditions. There was also a gradient from malacophylls to sclerophylls, with sclerophylls having lower g1 values under well-watered conditions and a lower sensitivity of apparent Vcmax to drought. Despite the limited amount of data available for this analysis, it is possible to draw some firm conclusions for modeling: (1) stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to photosynthesis must both be considered for the short-term response to drought and (2) plants adapted to arid climate respond very differently from others.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.05.009
机译:模型在如何表示干旱胁迫对植物气体交换的影响上存在分歧。一些模型假设干旱胁迫影响植物的边际水分利用效率(边际WUE =ΔA/ΔE;即蒸腾量每变化的光合作用变化),而其他模型则假设干旱胁迫直接影响光合作用的能力。我们通过分析22个实验数据集的结果对干旱胁迫进行了调查,其中在水分胁迫水平升高的情况下测量了光合作用,气孔导度和黎明前叶片水势。我们的分析以最近开发的气孔模型为框架,该模型协调了预测气孔导度的经验和最佳方法。该模型具有单个参数g 1 ,即边际WUE的递减函数。物种在潮湿条件下的估计g 1 值和水分胁迫下g 1 下降的速率差异很大。在某些物种中,特别是硬叶树木,g 1 几乎保持恒定甚至增加。发现光合作用的下降几乎普遍,而其下降幅度不足以解释g 1 的下降,这表明表观羧化能力(V cmax )下降。物种在黎明前的水势上有所不同,在黎明前的水势中,V cmax 下降得最陡,而下降的陡度也不同。主成分分析揭示了从树木到草药的水相关策略的梯度。草本植物在潮湿条件下的表观V cmax 较高,但树木在干燥条件下倾向于保持更多的开放气孔和较高的表观V cmax 。从水生植物的叶绿素到硬菌素也存在梯度,在充分灌溉的条件下,硬脂素的g 1 值较低,并且表观V cmax 对干旱的敏感性较低。尽管可用于该分析的数据量有限,但仍有可能得出一些可靠的建模结论:(1)对于干旱的短期响应,必须同时考虑光合作用的气孔和非气孔限制,以及(2)植物适应干旱气候的响应方式与其他响应方式截然不同。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.05.009

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号