...
【24h】

Environmental Sound Awareness in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users and Cochlear Implant Candidates

机译:经验丰富的耳蜗植入用户和耳蜗植入候选人的环境声音意识

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: To determine if postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant (CI) users have better environmental sound awareness (ESA) compared with adult patients eligible for CIs who have not yet undergone implantation. Study Design: Cross-sectional cohort study. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: A group of 39 postlingually deaf adult patients who are experienced CI users (ECI), and a group of 20 postlingually deaf adult patients who are cochlear implant candidates (CIC) awaiting implantation. Intervention: Cochlear implantation. Main Outcome Measure: Environmental sound awareness as measured by accuracy (percent correct) using the computerized, Familiar Environmental Sounds Test-Identification (FEST-I). Results: There was no significant difference between ESA in our sample of ECI users versus CIC patients. The ECI users scored an average FEST-I accuracy of 59.9% (SD 14.3). In comparison, the CICs had an average FEST-I accuracy of 54.7% (SD 26.4). This difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that, despite the commonly held notion that improved ESA may be a benefit of cochlear implantation, our sample of ECI users did not demonstrate superior performance compared with CICs.
机译:目的:确定后聋成人耳蜗植入物(CI)用户是否具有更好的环境声音意识(ESA)与有资格尚未植入的CIS的成年患者相比。研究设计:横截面队列研究。设置:第三推荐中心。患者:一组39例后期聋人成年患者,有经验的CI用户(ECI),以及一组20名后期聋人成年患者,他是等待植入的耳蜗植入候选者(CIC)。干预:耳蜗植入。主要结果措施:通过使用计算机化的准确度(正确)测量的环境声音意识,熟悉的环境声音测试 - 识别(FEST-I)。结果:ESA在我们的ECI用户样本与CIC患者中没有显着差异。 ECI用户的平均FEST-i准确度为59.9%(SD 14.3)。相比之下,CICS平均FEST-i准确度为54.7%(SD 26.4)。这种差异没有统计学意义。结论:我们的研究结果表明,尽管普遍持有的顾问,改善ESA可能是扶正植入的好处,但我们的ECI用户样本与CICS相比,我们的ECI用户并未表现出优越的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号