...
首页> 外文期刊>Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery: official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery >Patient Decision Making in Vestibular Schwannoma: A Survey of the Acoustic Neuroma Association
【24h】

Patient Decision Making in Vestibular Schwannoma: A Survey of the Acoustic Neuroma Association

机译:前庭施瓦新瘤的患者决策:声学神经瘤协会的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective To assess the decision-making process of patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS). Study Design Patients with VS completed a voluntary survey over a 3-month period. Setting Surveys were distributed online through email, Facebook, and member website. Subjects and Methods All patients had a diagnosis of VS and were members of the Acoustic Neuroma Association (ANA). A total of 789 patients completed the online survey. Results Of the 789 participants, 474 (60%) cited physician recommendation as a significant influential factor in deciding treatment. In our sample, 629 (80%) saw multiple VS specialists and 410 (52%) sought second opinions within the same specialty. Of those who received multiple consults, 242 (59%) of patients reported receiving different opinions regarding treatment. Those undergoing observation spent significantly less time with the physician (41 minutes) compared to surgery (68 minutes) and radiation (60 minutes) patients ( P < .001). A total of 32 (4%) patients stated the physician alone made the decision for treatment, and 29 (4%) felt they did not understand all possible treatment options before final decision was made. Of the 414 patients who underwent surgery, 66 (16%) felt they were pressured by the surgeon to choose surgical treatment. Conclusion Deciding on a proper VS treatment for patients can be complicated and dependent on numerous clinical and individual factors. It is clear that many patients find it important to seek second opinions from other specialties. Moreover, second opinions within the same specialty are common, and the number of neurotologists consulted correlated with higher decision satisfaction.
机译:目的评估前庭施瓦南瘤(VS)患者的决策过程。学习设计患者与VS完成了3个月内的自愿调查。设置调查通过电子邮件,Facebook和会员网站在线分发。受试者和方法所有患者的诊断为VS,也是声学神经瘤关联(ANA)的成员。共有789名患者完成了在线调查。 789名参与者的结果,474名(60%)引用了医生推荐作为决定治疗的重要影响因素。在我们的样本中,629(80%)看到多个VS专家,410(52%)在同一专业中寻求第二种意见。收到多项咨询的人,242名(59%)的患者报告了有关治疗的不同意见。与手术(68分钟)和辐射(60分钟)患者(P <0.001)相比,接受观察观察的时间明显减少时间(41分钟)。共有32名(4%)患者单独举行医生进行治疗决定,29(4%)觉得他们在最终决定之前不了解所有可能的治疗方案。在接受手术的414名患者中,66名(16%)觉得他们被外科医生迫使外科治疗。结论决定对患者进行适当的vs治疗可以复杂且依赖于许多临床和个体因素。很明显,许多患者发现从其他专业中寻求第二种意见很重要。此外,同一专业中的第二种意见是常见的,并且神经选择学家的数量与更高的决定满足相关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号