...
首页> 外文期刊>Safety science >Safe limits, mindful organizing and loss of control in commercial aviation
【24h】

Safe limits, mindful organizing and loss of control in commercial aviation

机译:安全限制,谨慎组织和商业航空控制失去

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In commercial aviation, loss of control (LOC) incidents are currently the single biggest cause of accident fatalities. Although LOC incidents typically have multiple causes, inappropriate flight crew responses to unfamiliar conditions are a major contributor. It has been suggested that restricted exposure to unusual aircraft behavior and limited manual flying are partly responsible for this, both of which are aggravated by high levels of flight deck automation. In this paper, we draw on ideas from human-automation interactions, organizational limits, mindful organizing and sensemaking to explore how systems that are very safe by design may subtly undermine mindful organizing, reducing the ability of operators to handle unusual and expected situations. We discuss "the paradox of almost totally safe systems" (Amalberti, 2001) and argue that as systems become safer by design it is increasingly difficult for operators to handle unusual, extreme events, partly due to an erosion of mindful organizing and partly to the limitations of existing training and simulation.
机译:在商业航空中,对控制丧失(LOC)事件目前是事故死亡事故的最大原因。虽然Loc事件通常具有多种原因,但对不熟悉的条件的不适当的航班响应是一个主要的贡献者。有人建议,限制风格暴露于不寻常的飞机行为和有限的手动飞行部分负责这一点,这两者都是由高水平的飞行甲板自动化加剧。在本文中,我们借鉴了人类自动化互动,组织限制,注意组织和传感的想法,以探讨设计非常安全的系统可能会巧妙地破坏一致的组织,减少运营商处理异常和预期情况的能力。我们讨论了“几乎完全安全的系统的悖论”(Amalberti,2001)并认为随着系统变得更加安全的设计,运营商越来越困难地处理不寻常的极端事件,部分原因是因为心灵组织侵蚀,部分是现有培训和模拟的限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号