首页> 外文期刊>Schizophrenia research >Double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy of lurasidone and ziprasidone in clinically stable outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.
【24h】

Double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy of lurasidone and ziprasidone in clinically stable outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

机译:双盲酮和齐拉西酮在精神分裂症或精神分裂症患者临床稳定门诊患者中的安全性和疗效进行双盲比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Lurasidone is a new atypical antipsychotic agent with high affinity for D(2), 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(7) receptors. The current study evaluated the safety and efficacy of lurasidone and ziprasidone in stable outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. METHODS: Adult outpatients who met DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder that was chronic (>/=6 months duration) and stable were randomized to 21 days of double-blind treatment with a fixed dose of lurasidone 120 mg once daily (N=150) or ziprasidone 80 mg BID (N=151). Changes from baseline in efficacy measures were evaluated using mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) analyses. RESULTS: The proportion of patients who discontinued from the study was similar for lurasidone and ziprasidone (32.5% vs. 30.7%); the proportion who discontinued due to adverse events was similar (10.4% vs. 11.1%). Treatment with lurasidone and ziprasidone was associated with a small endpoint reduction in median weight (-0.65 kg vs. -0.35 kg) and median total cholesterol (-6.4 vs. -4.4 mg/dL); no endpoint change was observed in median triglycerides (0.0 vs. 0.0 mg/dL). There were no clinically significant changes in other laboratory or ECG parameters. Improvement was observed on an MMRM analysis of the PANSS total score for lurasidone and ziprasidone at Week 1 (-4.1 vs. -1.6; P=0.020), Week 2, (-6.1 vs. -3.6; P=0.074), and Week 3 (-6.3 vs. -4.5; P=0.229). CONCLUSION: In this double-blind, fixed-dose comparison of lurasidone 120 mg and ziprasidone 160 mg, treatment with lurasidone was well-tolerated and safe, and was not associated with clinically significant changes from baseline in weight, metabolic parameters, or QTc interval. Study limitations include the relatively short trial duration and lack of placebo control.
机译:背景:LURASIDONE是一种新的非典型抗精神病药剂,具有高亲和力的D(2),5-HT(2A)和5-HT(7)受体。目前的研究评估了LuraAnidone和Ziprasidone在诊断患有精神分裂症或SchizoAfecceive病症的稳定门诊患者中的安全性和疗效。方法:达到慢性(> / = 6个月持续时间)和稳定的精神分裂症或血基疗法疾病的DSM-IV标准的成人门诊患者被随机分配至21天的双盲治疗,用固定剂量的LURASIDONE每日一次(n = 150)或Ziprasidone 80 mg BID(n = 151)。使用混合模型进行重复措施(MMRM)分析,评估从基线的变化。结果:从研究中停药的患者的比例类似于LuraAnidone和Ziprasidone(32.5%vs.30.7%);因不良事件而停止的比例相似(10.4%vs.11%)。用LURASIDONE和ZIPRASIDONE治疗与中间重量的小终点降低(-0.65千克 - 0.35千克)和中值总胆固醇(-6.4 vs. -4.4mg / dl);中值甘油三酯(0.0mg / dL)中没有观察到终点变化。其他实验室或ECG参数没有临床上显着的变化。在第1周(-4.1与-1.6; p = 0.020),第2周,第2周(-4.1 vs. -1.6; p = 0.020),观察到改善兰西酮和齐拉西酮的PANSS总得分。(-6.1 vs. -3.6; p = 0.074) 3(-6.3 vs. -4.5; p = 0.229)。结论:在这种双盲,固定剂量比较LURAANIDONE 120 mg和Ziprasidone 160mg,用LuraAnidone治疗耐受良好耐受,安全,并且与重量,代谢参数或QTC间隔的基线临床显着变化无关。研究限制包括相对较短的试验期和缺乏安慰剂控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号