...
首页> 外文期刊>Schizophrenia bulletin >Effectiveness of Long-Acting Injectable vs Oral Antipsychotics in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis of Prospective and Retrospective Cohort Studies
【24h】

Effectiveness of Long-Acting Injectable vs Oral Antipsychotics in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis of Prospective and Retrospective Cohort Studies

机译:精神分裂症患者长效可注射与口服抗精神病药的有效性:预期和回顾队列研究的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Compared with oral antipsychotics (OAPs), long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) should improve medication adherence and reduce relapses in schizophrenia. However, meta-analyses of randomized trials and mirror-image studies yielded inconsistent results. Nonrandomized cohort studies with parallel comparisons of LAIs and OAPs offer a third design to examine this issue. We meta-analyzed cohort studies with 24 weeks duration and hospitalization data. Primary outcome was hospitalization rate, ie, number of hospitalizations per person-year. Secondary outcomes included hospitalization risk, ie, proportion of patients experiencing 1 hospitalizations, all-cause discontinuation, and total hospitalization days. Patient severity and/or chronicity at baseline was also meta-analyzed and explored as a potential effect size moderator. Altogether, 42 studies (n = 101 624; follow-up = 18.6 +/- 10.0 mo) were meta-analyzed. LAIs were superior to OAPs regarding hospitalization rate (studies = 15, person-years = 68 009, rate ratio = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.78-0.93, P .001) and all-cause discontinuations (studies = 10, n = 37 293, risk ratio = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.67-0.91, P = .001), but not regarding hospitalization risk (studies = 33, n = 51 733, risk ratio = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.84-1.00, P = .06), and hospitalization days (studies = 11, n = 21 328, Hedges' g = -0.05, 95% CI = -0.16 to 0.06, P = .39). Illness severity/chronicity was significantly greater in patients prescribed LAIs vs OAPs when all available information was pooled together (studies = 23, n = 61 806, Hedges' g = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.03-0.26, P = .01), but not when examined separately. In summary, this meta-analysis of cohort studies, which included patients that are broadly representative of clinical practice, indicates that LAIs are superior to OAPs. The lack of significant superiority of LAIs for hospitalization risk and hospital days needs to be interpreted in the context of naturalistic treatment selection with subsequently greater illness severity/chronicity in LAI-treated patients.
机译:与口腔抗精神病药(OAPS)相比,长效可注射抗精神病药(LAIS)应改善药物粘附并减少精神分裂症复发。然而,随机试验和镜像研究的荟萃分析产生了不一致的结果。非andomized队列与Lais和Oaps的并行比较提供第三种设计来检查此问题。我们通过24周的持续时间和住院数据进行了荟萃分析的队列研究。主要结果是住院率,即每人的住院人数。二次结果包括住院风险,即患者的患者的比例,均为住院治疗,全面停药和住院日。基线的患者严重程度和/或慢性病也分析并探索为潜在的效果大小主持人。共有42项研究(n = 101 624;后续= 18.6 +/- 10.0 mo)进行了荟萃分析。 LAIS与住院率的橡胶(研究= 15,人年= 68 009,速率比= 0.85,95%CI = 0.78-0.93,P&。)和全部导致的停止(研究= 10,n = 37 293,风险比= 0.78,95%CI = 0.67-0.91,p = .001),但不考虑住院风险(研究= 33,n = 51 733,风险比率= 0.92,95%CI = 0.84-1.00 ,p = .06)和住院日(研究= 11,n = 21 328,Hedges'g = -0.05,95%Ci = -0.16〜0.06,p = .39)。在汇集所有可用信息的患者中,患者患者严重程度/慢性显着更大(研究= 23,n = 61 806,Hedges的G = 0.15,95%Ci = 0.03-0.26,P = .01),但不是单独检查时。总之,群组研究的这种荟萃分析包括广泛代表临床实践的患者表明,LaIs优于橡皮。对于住院风险和医院日缺乏显着优越性,需要在自然主义治疗选择的背景下解释,随后随后患有含土治疗患者的疾病严重程度/慢性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号