首页> 外文期刊>SAE international journal of transportation safety >Parametric Analysis and Optimization of Variables Affecting the Brain Injury Criterion (BrIC) in Various Crash Scenarios
【24h】

Parametric Analysis and Optimization of Variables Affecting the Brain Injury Criterion (BrIC) in Various Crash Scenarios

机译:各种碰撞情景中脑损伤标准(BRIC)的变量参数分析及优化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Incompressibility of the brain makes it susceptible to damage from shear strains. Head rotational motion can easily produce high shear strains causing brain injury. Since head injury criterion (HIC) does not account for rotational motion, a brain injury criterion (BrIC) was developed. To design potential countermeasures for reducing BrIC, it is important to investigate the parameters that influence BrIC. This article focuses on parametric analysis to examine the sensitivity of BrIC to vehicle design and crash-related parameters, and identifying important parameters which can be controlled in developing countermeasures for reducing BrIC. Global Human Body Models Consortium (GHBMC) 50th percentile male simplified human finite element (FE) model was used in this study. Four different analyses were conducted: a. Design of Experiments (DOE) study to investigate sensitivity of BrIC to impact direction and crash pulse severity b. DOE studies, with fixed crash severity, for frontal, far side oblique, and near side oblique crash modes to identify important vehicle design parameters influencing BrIC c. Optimization for frontal, far side oblique, and near side oblique crash modes to minimize BrIC using important parameters (identified from step b) as design variables d. Investigate greater frontal airbag coverage as a possible countermeasure. The results demonstrated that a. BrIC was most sensitive to principal direction of force (PDOF) and crash pulse severity b. With fixed crash severity, the important vehicle design parameters affecting BrIC were the frontal airbag parameters (mass flow rate (MFR), firing time, friction), belt load limiter, and side airbag friction c. Low BrIC values could be attained for each crash mode with the highest optimized BrIC of 0.59 for the far side driver oblique crash mode (representing 1.67% risk of Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 4+brain injury), and under 0.5 (representing 0% risk of AIS 4+brain injury) for the full-frontal and near side driver oblique crash modes; d. Significant reduction in BrIC values was possible with increased frontal airbag coverage.
机译:大脑的不可压缩性使其容易受到剪切菌株的损伤。头部旋转运动可以容易地产生脑损伤的高剪切菌株。由于头部损伤标准(HIC)不考虑旋转运动,因此开发了脑损伤标准(BRIC)。设计潜在对策来减少Bric,重要的是研究影响Bric的参数。本文重点介绍参数分析,以检查BRIC到车辆设计和碰撞相关参数的敏感性,并识别可以控制在减少金砖黄褐色的对策中的重要参数。全球人体模型联盟(GHBMC)第50百分位男性简化的人体有限元(FE)模型用于本研究。进行了四种不同的分析:a。实验设计(DOE)研究,研究BRIC碰撞方向和碰撞脉冲严重程度的敏感性。 DOE研究,固定碰撞严重程度,对于正面,远侧倾斜和近侧斜碰撞模式,以确定影响Bric C的重要车辆设计参数。正面,远侧倾斜和近侧斜碰撞模式的优化,以最大限度地利用重要参数(从步骤b识别)作为设计变量d。调查更大的正面气囊覆盖,作为可能的对策。结果表明了一个。 Bric对主要力方向最敏感(PDOF)和崩溃脉冲严重程度B。通过固定碰撞严重程度,影响Bric的重要车辆设计参数是前气囊参数(质量流量(MFR),射击时间,摩擦),皮带负荷限制器和侧面气囊摩擦C.对于远侧驱动器倾斜碰撞模式的每个碰撞模式,每个碰撞模式都可以获得低金属值,其最优化的Bric为0.59(缩写损伤量表(AIS)4 +脑损伤的1.67%的风险),低于0.5(代表0%全面和近侧驾驶员斜碰撞模式的AIS 4 +脑损伤的风险;天。通过增加的前空气囊覆盖率,可以显着降低Bric值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号