【24h】

Evaluation of prevention and disruption of biofilm in contact lens cases

机译:隐形眼镜箱中生物膜预防和破坏的评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Purpose The presence of biofilm in the lens case has been shown to be a risk factor for contamination of lenses and consequently microbial keratitis. This study aimed to evaluate effectiveness of solutions for rigid contact lenses in prevention and disruption of biofilm in lens cases and methods for biofilm detection. Method This study adopted a stepwise approach to evaluate effectiveness of four rigid lens disinfecting solutions against biofilm. These included two polyhexamethylene bigiuanide ( PHMB ) solutions?and a chlorhexidine/ PHMB ‐based solution, as well as a novel povidone‐iodine formulation. The presence of biofilm following exposure to the solutions was assessed using both crystal violet ( CV ) staining and MTT (3‐(4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) viability assay, taking into account the effect of lens case design. Three lens case designs, conventional flat, large bucket type, and cylindrical cases, were investigated for the ability to trap stain and allow biofilm formation. Results Considerable differences were noted between solutions in their ability to prevent and disrupt biofilm ( p ??0.001). Lens case design greatly influenced optical density ( OD ) measurements even in negative controls, as cylindrical cases trapped more stain, increasing OD readings. Correcting for this factor reduced variations, but could not differentiate between residues and biofilm. MTT assay revealed that both povidone‐iodine and chlorhexidine‐containing solutions could effectively kill??95% of organisms, whilst PHMB ‐based solutions were less effective with up to 55% of staphylococci and 41% of Pseudomonas surviving at 24?h. Conclusion Biofilm can rapidly form in lens cases and may not be killed by disinfecting solutions. Of the solutions tested, none were able to prevent biofilm formation or disrupt established biofilm, but those containing chlorhexidine or povidone iodine were able to penetrate the biofilm and kill organisms. Assessment of biofilm by CV assay may be confounded by lens case design. Whilst CV assay can demonstrate presence of biofilm, this technique should be accompanied by viability assay to determine bactericidal activity.
机译:摘要目的,在镜片壳体中的生物膜存在是污染镜片的危险因素,因此是微生物角膜炎的危险因素。本研究旨在评估刚性隐形眼镜的解决方案的效果,在镜片案例中预防和破坏生物膜和生物膜检测方法。方法本研究采用了一种逐步方法来评估四种刚性镜片消毒溶液对生物膜的效果。这些包括两种聚环甲基二胍(PHMB)溶液?和氯己定/ pHMB的溶液,以及新的POVIDONE-碘配方。使用晶体紫(CV)染色和MTT(3-(4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基)-2,5-二苯基四唑溴铵)的活力测定,评估在暴露于溶液后的生物膜的存在,考虑到镜片盒设计的影响。研究了三个镜片盒式设计,传统的平坦,大桶型和圆柱形壳体,以捕获污渍的能力并允许生物膜形成。结果在防止和破坏生物膜的能力方面存在相当大的差异(p≤≤0.001)。镜片盒设计甚至在阴性对照中大大影响了光学密度(OD)测量,随着圆柱形的情况,越来越染色,增加了OD读数。校正该因子降低了变化,但不能区分残留物和生物膜。 MTT测定显示,含有聚酮 - 碘和氯己定溶液的溶液可以有效地杀死?&α&α& 95%的生物体,而PHMB的溶液较低,高达55%的葡萄球菌和41%的假单胞菌在24℃下存活41% 。结论生物膜可以在镜片盒中快速形成,可能不会被消毒溶液杀死。在测试的解决方案中,没有能够防止生物膜形成或破坏成立的生物膜,但含有氯己定或聚苯胺碘的那些能够穿透生物膜并杀死生物体。通过CV测定评估Biofilm可以通过镜片盒设计来混淆。虽然CV测定可以证明存在生物膜的存在,但这种技术应伴有活力测定以确定杀菌活性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号