...
首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmology >Endophthalmitis after Intravitreal Injection of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitors
【24h】

Endophthalmitis after Intravitreal Injection of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitors

机译:椎间膜炎腔内注射血管内皮生长因子抑制剂后

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PurposeWe describe the presentation of patients developing endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors. Moreover, we evaluate the management by comparing the outcomes of immediate tap and injection of intravitreal antibiotics (TAI) versus initial surgical pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Finally, we analyze the predictive factors of visual outcomes at 6-month follow-up.DesignRetrospective, single-center, nonrandomized interventional study.ParticipantsPatients developing endophthalmitis after receiving an intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agent between 2006 and?16.MethodsAll patients received a vitreous biopsy sent for cultures before the initiation of treatment: TAI group versus PPV with intravitreal antibiotics (PPV group).Main Outcome MeasuresBest-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6-month follow-up after treatment for endophthalmitis.ResultsA total of 258 357 intravitreal injections occurred over the course of the 10-year period, of which 40 patients (0.016%) had endophthalmitis within 3 weeks after injection. In total, 34 patients (85.0%) had pain and 25 patients (62.5%) had hypopyon on initial examination. Among 24 culture-positive cases, 66.7% of the causative organisms were coagulase-negativeStaphylococcus, followed byStreptococcusspecies (10.0%). The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) at 6-month follow-up was significantly worse for patients who had a positive culture forStreptococcusspecies (4.0; standard deviation [SD], 0.8) (approximately light perception) compared with those who had a positive culture for coagulase-negativeStaphylococcus(0.4; SD, 0.3) (<20/50) (P< 0.0001). Compared with the TAI group, a higher proportion of samples were culture-positive in the PPV group (90.9% vs. 48.3%,P?0.03). There was no statistically significant difference in BCVA at 6-month follow-up between the TAI and PPV groups. Younger age (<85 years) and lower intraocular pressure (IOP) (d25 mmHg) at presentation were predictive of achieving a BCVA of 20/400 or better at 6-month follow-up after treatment. Initial management (TAI vs. PPV), duration of symptoms, presence of pain, presence of hypopyon, presenting BCVA, and culture status (positive vs. negative) were not found to be predictive of visual outcomes at 6-month follow-up.ConclusionsNo significant difference in BCVA at 6-month follow-up was detected between the TAI and PPV groups. Younger age and lower IOP at presentation were associated with better visual outcomes at 6-month follow-up.
机译:目的威描述了术后血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抑制剂在玻璃体内注射后发育内眼炎患者的介绍。此外,我们通过比较立即抽头和注射玻璃体抗生素(TAI)与初始外科PARA玻璃体切除术(PPV)来评估管理。最后,我们分析了6个月的随访的视觉结果的预测因素。DesignReTrospive,单中心,非扫描介入研究。在2006年至16日之间接受玻璃体内注射抗VEGF试剂后的氨基耐药性。玻璃体活检在治疗开始前送入培养物:大群与玻璃体抗生素(PPV组)的PPV(PPV组)。在治疗后6个月后的6个月随访中,较矫正的视力(BCVA)。总共258次357玻璃体内注射发生在10年期内,其中40名患者(0.016%)在注射后3周内具有内眼性炎。总共34名患者(85.0%)疼痛,25名患者(62.5%)对初步检查进行了缺钙。在24例培养阳性病例中,66.7%的致病生物是凝壳酶 - 否定的疗法,其次是Batthococcusspecies(10.0%)。对于患有阳性培养的患者(4.0;标准偏差[SD],0.8),最佳纠正的视力(BCVA)的最佳视力(分辨率最小角度[Logmar] [Logmar]的对数[Logmar])显着更差。 (大约光感知)与具有阳性培养蛋白 - 否定的培养物(0.4; SD,0.3)(<0.000)的那些培养的人(P <0.0001)相比。与TAI组相比,PPV组中培养阳性比例较高(90.9%,P≤0.03)。 BCVA在Tai和PPV组之间的6个月随访中没有统计学上显着差异。呈现较小的年龄(<85岁)和较低的眼压(IOP)(D25mmHg)在介绍中预测到治疗后6个月的6个月随访中的20/400或更好的BCVA。初始管理(大与PPV),症状持续时间,疼痛的存在,低对比,呈现BCVA和培养地位(阳性与阴性)在6个月的随访中预测视觉结果。结论在Tai和PPV组之间检测到6个月随访中BCVA的显着差异。年龄较小的年龄和较低的IOP与6个月的随访有关的视觉结果有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号