...
首页> 外文期刊>Obesity surgery >Comparison of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication Regarding Efficacy and Safety: a Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Comparison of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication Regarding Efficacy and Safety: a Meta-Analysis

机译:腹腔镜套管胃切除术和腹腔镜更大曲率镀读性关于疗效和安全性的比较:Meta分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic greater curvature plication (LGCP) are two restrictive bariatric procedures. Eight studies (three randomized, controlled trials, four retrospective studies, and one prospective study) with 536 patients on LSG and LGCP were included by searching PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. The software Review Manager 5.3 was used to evaluate operation time, adverse events, percent excess weight loss (%EWL), resolution of obesity-related comorbidities, and postoperative hospital stay. Despite the limitations, this meta-analysis suggests that LSG is superior to LGCP in terms of providing greater %EWL at the follow-up of 3, 6, and 12 months and 3 years. LSG gains shorter postoperative hospital stay than LGCP. No significant difference was found in operation time, adverse events, and the resolution of obesity-related comorbidities.
机译:腹腔镜套管胃切除术(LSG)和腹腔镜更大的曲率镀(LGCP)是两个限制性的肥胖症程序。 通过搜索PubMed,Embase和Cochrane图书馆,包括八项研究(三项随机,受控试验,四项回顾性研究和一项前瞻性研究),包括536名LSG和LGCP患者。 软件审查管理器5.3用于评估操作时间,不良事件,减肥百分比百分比,肥胖相关的合并症和术后住院住宿。 尽管有局限性,但该荟萃分析表明,在3,6和12个月和3年的随访中提供更高的%EWL,LSG优于LGCP。 LSG收益较短的术后医院停留而不是LGCP。 在运营时间,不良事件和肥胖相关的合并症的分辨率中没有发现显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号