首页> 外文期刊>Age and Ageing: The Journal of the British Geriatrics Society and the British Society for Research on Ageing >The assessment of services promoting independence and recovery in elders trial (ASPIRE): A pre-planned meta-analysis of three independent randomised controlled trial evaluations of ageing in place initiatives in New Zealand
【24h】

The assessment of services promoting independence and recovery in elders trial (ASPIRE): A pre-planned meta-analysis of three independent randomised controlled trial evaluations of ageing in place initiatives in New Zealand

机译:评估促进老年人独立和康复的服务的评估(ASPIRE):新西兰三项独立的随机对照试验评估的预先计划的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: Intermediate care has been developed to support older people to remain living in their own homes, combining a higher level of support with a rehabilitation focus. Evidence around their effectiveness remains mixed and there is ambiguity around the components. Aims: To establish the impact of intermediate care on institutional free survival in frail older people referred for needs assessment in New Zealand (NZ).Methods: pre-planned meta-analysis of three randomised controlled trials with follow-up at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. A total of 567 older people at risk of permanent institutionalisation as well as their primary informal carer (n = 234) were randomised to either intermediate or usual care. Interventions had common key features of care management, though varied in the use of ongoing care provision. Results: The adjusted hazard ratio for the combined primary outcome of death or residential entry was 31% lower with a 95% confidence interval of (9%, 47%) for the intermediate care initiatives compared with usual care. Conclusion: Intermediate care utilising a care management approach reduces a frail older person's risk of mortality and permanent institutionalisation.
机译:简介:已经开发了中级护理,以将老年人的更高水平的支持与康复重点结合起来,以支持老年人继续生活在自己的家中。关于其有效性的证据仍然参差不齐,各组成部分之间也存在歧义。目的:建立中间护理对新西兰需要进行评估的脆弱老年人的机构免费生存的影响。方法:对三项随机对照试验进行预先计划的荟萃分析,并分别于3、6、3和6进行随访。 12、18和24个月。共有567名处于永久性机构化风险中的老年人及其主要的非正式护理人员(n = 234)被随机分配到中级或常规护理。干预措施具有护理管理的共同关键特征,尽管对持续护理的使用有所不同。结果:与常规护理相比,对于合并的主要死亡或居住进入的主要结局,调整后的危险比降低了31%,中间护理措施的置信区间为9%(9%,47%)。结论:采用护理管理方法的中级护理降低了体弱的老年人的死亡风险和永久性的机构化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号