...
首页> 外文期刊>BJU international >Retroperitoneal decortication of simple renal cysts vs decortication with wadding using perirenal fat tissue: results of a prospective randomized trial.
【24h】

Retroperitoneal decortication of simple renal cysts vs decortication with wadding using perirenal fat tissue: results of a prospective randomized trial.

机译:单纯肾囊肿的腹膜后去皮术与使用肾周脂肪组织浸润的去皮术:一项前瞻性随机试验的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES To evaluate, in a pilot prospective randomized trial, the safety, effectiveness and radiological recurrence of retroperitoneal renal cyst decortication compared with retroperitoneal decortication with wadding using perirenal pedicled fat tissue. PATIENTS AND METHODS From March 2004 to December 2007, 40 patients with simple renal cysts were enrolled and randomized; 22 (group A) had a simple retroperitoneal decortication (SRD) and 18 (group B) a decortication with wadding of the cyst using perirenal fat tissue (RDCW). The following variables were recorded: age, gender, side, size on ultrasonography/computed tomography (CT), location, operative duration, blood loss, complications, pathology, presence or absence of flank pain, hypertension, urinary tract compression or urinary infection. The primary endpoint of this trial was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of both treatments. Secondary endpoints were safety and pain, hypertension and the resolution of urinary tract obstruction. RESULTS In all, 40 cysts were treated; there were no bilateral cysts. The mean (sd) size on CT was 11.9 (1.84) cm in group A and 12.8 (1.25) cm in group B (P = 0.1). All the procedures were completed laparoscopically and no conversion was necessary. There were no intraoperative complications. The mean (range) hospital stay was 3.4 (3-6) days. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for all variables assessed. There was a radiological recurrence in three patients (14%) in group A, but none in group B (all successful). CONCLUSION To be completely successful, with maximum safety and to prevent recurrences in the treatment of renal cysts, RCDW is recommended when a retroperitoneal approach is chosen, especially if the cyst is located anteriorly. When symptom relief is considered, RCDW duplicates the results obtained with SRD.
机译:目的在一项前瞻性前瞻性随机试验中,评估肾小梁周围肥大的腹膜后肾囊肿脱管术与腹膜后肾囊肿脱管术的安全性,有效性和放射学复发。患者与方法2004年3月至2007年12月,纳入40例单纯性肾囊肿患者并随机分组。 22例(A组)有简单的腹膜后剥脱术(SRD),而18例(B组)有使用肾周脂肪组织(RDCW)的囊肿填塞术。记录以下变量:年龄,性别,侧面,超声/计算机断层扫描(CT)大小,位置,手术持续时间,失血,并发症,病理,有无侧腹疼痛,高血压,尿路压迫或尿路感染。该试验的主要终点是评估和比较两种治疗方法的疗效。次要终点是安全性和疼痛,高血压和尿路梗阻的缓解。结果总共治疗了40个囊肿;没有双侧囊肿。 A组CT的平均(sd)大小为11.9(1.84)cm,B组为12.8(1.25)cm(P = 0.1)。所有过程均在腹腔镜下完成,无需转换。没有术中并发症。平均住院时间为3.4(3-6)天。对于所有评估的变量,两组之间没有统计学上的显着差异。 A组中有3例患者(14%)发生放射学复发,而B组中无一例(均成功)。结论为了获得最大的安全性并防止肾囊肿复发,要完全成功,建议选择腹膜后入路,特别是如果囊肿位于前部时,建议采用RCDW。考虑缓解症状时,RCDW复制了使用SRD获得的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号