首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural and Forest Meteorology >Evaluation of two risk assessment methods for sowing maize in Kenya.
【24h】

Evaluation of two risk assessment methods for sowing maize in Kenya.

机译:对肯尼亚两种播种玉米风险评估方法的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Dry and wet sowing methods of rainfed maize in Trans Nzoia and Uasin Gishu districts, a major grain belt in Kenya, were evaluated. The evaluation is based on a daily analysis of soil water balance over the initial growth stage (30 days) by identifying and quantifying the risk of failure of crop development. Historical daily climatic data of a 30-year period and soil data from seven stations, spatially distributed in the study area, were considered. Results indicate that germination for dry sowing are by up to 9 days earlier for an early and normal onset of the rainy season in comparison with sowing after the onset of the rains (wet sowing). The difference increases to about 15 days for a late onset of the rainy season in most stations. The risk level representing a false start of the growing season increased from 1.5% for wet sowing to 9.9% for dry sowing..
机译:评估了肯尼亚主要粮食带Trans Nzoia和Uasin Gishu地区的雨养玉米干法和湿法播种方法。该评估基于对初期生长阶段(30天)土壤水分平衡的每日分析,该分析通过识别和量化作物发育失败的风险来进行。考虑了过去30年的每日气候数据和来自七个站点的土壤数据,这些数据空间分布在研究区域内。结果表明,与降雨开始后的播种(湿播)相比,雨季的早期和正常发作的干播发芽要早9天。在大多数气象站,雨季来临以后,差异增加到约15天。代表生长季节错误开始的风险水平从湿播的1.5%增加到干播的9.9%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号